But... you have the ability to be your own twitter, or FB or Afmug...

From: Steve Jones 
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 10:14 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism

yep, and your message can be removed in an instant if it does not comply with 
the narrative

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:06 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  Not really.  Today you can get your message out to the world with a tweet.
  How would you have been able to do that 100 years ago?

  From: Steven Kenney 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:54 AM
  To: af 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism

  I sense overwhelming sarcasm.  

  -- 
  Steven Kenney
  Network Operations Manager
  WaveDirect Telecommunications
  http://www.wavedirect.net
  (519)737-WAVE (9283)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
  To: "af" <af@af.afmug.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:14:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism


  100 years ago it was newspapers and they only printed what they wanted you to 
hear.  Things are much better now.


  Sent from my iPhone


    On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, Jason McKemie 
<j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:


    It's a problem when the main conduits for communication are all private 
corporations though, especially in situations like this.

    On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:

      Most people don’t realize that the constitutional protection of free 
speech protects the government from stifling speech...private citizens and 
corporations are not required to protect anyone’s speech.  

      Not saying I agree or disagree with it, just stating what the 
constitution says.

      YMMV

      -Sean


      On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 PM Jason McKemie 
<j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:

        Being "not evil" I guess. Another copy has been put up, but the 
stifling of free speech is a bit alarming. They do this all of the time with 
things the left deems inappropriate. I'm pretty much centrist, but the fringe 
at both sides is absolutely abhorrent, I'll go back to adhering to lent now.

        On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:

          Whoa, google took it down?  That's amazing.   I wonder what the 
process that resulted in that was?


          On 4/27/20 8:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:

            I'll watch it again, but it's a bit difficult now since Google took 
it down. Doesn't help the case that they feel like they need to cover it up as 
opposed to just tearing it apart if it is so wrong.

            On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:

              It's was pitched that way but you look at what they are doing 
with the "numbers" is totally fictitious...



              On 4/27/20 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:

                If we're thinking of the same video I thought it was pretty 
refreshing, and the overall gist of the thing seemed pretty sound to me.

                On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> 
wrote:

                  Yep, speculation that a couple of doctors in Kern County CA 
treated like science fact to back up their agenda...   Ethics in Medicine is 
just about dead, put another nail in the coffin..


                  On 4/27/20 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote:

                    Well... here we are one week later, and we just ticked over 
1 million confirmed infections in the US. Let's hope that's the tip of the 
iceberg, and that the actual infections is in the neighborhood of 50-80 
million. I don't believe the number is actually that high, but I would believe 
something around 5-8 million. Either way, it is still just speculation.




bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 4/20/2020 9:33 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

                      What are the treatments that are now working?  I try to 
be optimistic about antivirals and convalescent plasma, but right now they 
mainly have ventilators, which honestly aren’t very successful if 70-80% of the 
people die.  They keep doing that because it’s the textbook therapy for 
respiratory distress, but it ain’t working.  Even if it were working, 
ventilators are not a treatment, they don’t reverse the disease, they are just 
a measure to get you oxygen while your body hopefully fights the infection.  
And then you have the people experiencing kidney failure and needing dialysis, 
they’re not sure if the damage is permanent.



                      I hope you’re right that the medical community has 
learned how to treat it, but I haven’t heard the evidence for that.



                      Regarding a vaccine, one interesting piece of information 
I read was that even if they develop a successful and safe vaccine (many 
challenges including the sensitization problem), then they have to scale up 
vaccine production.  Right now most vaccines are just for each new wave of 
schoolchildren, this would have to be for the entire population.  And not in 
chicken eggs, it would have to be in big vats.  And the interesting part is 
they could repurpose fermentation tanks used for things like brewing beer.





                      From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com On Behalf Of Bill 
Prince
                      Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 11:20 AM
                      To: af@af.afmug.com
                      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism



                      Time will tell based on whether it actually starts 
declining in a meaningful way, or whether we're going to bump along for a bit. 
Remember, the goal was to flatten the curve; it wasn't necessarily going to 
reduce the number of infections. I get the impression that the medical 
community has learned a lot about how to actually treat it. 

                      Let's see where we are a week from today (April 27). If 
we are over 1 million infections, this may be going a while yet. If it is under 
1 million, I would be more encouraged.

bp<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 4/20/2020 8:20 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

                        Looks a bit Gaussian to me.  I hope...




                        <image001.png>





                       

                     



                 



             


        -- 
        AF mailing list
        AF@af.afmug.com
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

    -- 
    AF mailing list
    AF@af.afmug.com
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to