lol. we have the ability to be our own starlink too. you have any spare shekels ?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:34 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > But... you have the ability to be your own twitter, or FB or Afmug... > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 10:14 AM > *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism > > yep, and your message can be removed in an instant if it does not comply > with the narrative > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:06 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Not really. Today you can get your message out to the world with a tweet. >> How would you have been able to do that 100 years ago? >> >> *From:* Steven Kenney >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:54 AM >> *To:* af >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism >> >> I sense overwhelming sarcasm. >> >> -- >> Steven Kenney >> Network Operations Manager >> WaveDirect Telecommunications >> http://www.wavedirect.net >> (519)737-WAVE (9283) >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:14:10 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism >> >> 100 years ago it was newspapers and they only printed what they wanted >> you to hear. Things are much better now. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, Jason McKemie < >> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >> It's a problem when the main conduits for communication are all private >> corporations though, especially in situations like this. >> >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >> >>> Most people don’t realize that the constitutional protection of free >>> speech protects the government from stifling speech...private citizens and >>> corporations are not required to protect anyone’s speech. >>> >>> Not saying I agree or disagree with it, just stating what the >>> constitution says. >>> >>> YMMV >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 PM Jason McKemie < >>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Being "not evil" I guess. Another copy has been put up, but the >>>> stifling of free speech is a bit alarming. They do this all of the time >>>> with things the left deems inappropriate. I'm pretty much centrist, but the >>>> fringe at both sides is absolutely abhorrent, I'll go back to adhering to >>>> lent now. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Whoa, google took it down? That's amazing. I wonder what the >>>>> process that resulted in that was? >>>>> >>>>> On 4/27/20 8:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll watch it again, but it's a bit difficult now since Google took it >>>>> down. Doesn't help the case that they feel like they need to cover it up >>>>> as >>>>> opposed to just tearing it apart if it is so wrong. >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's was pitched that way but you look at what they are doing with >>>>>> the "numbers" is totally fictitious... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/27/20 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> If we're thinking of the same video I thought it was pretty >>>>>> refreshing, and the overall gist of the thing seemed pretty sound to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yep, speculation that a couple of doctors in Kern County CA treated >>>>>>> like science fact to back up their agenda... Ethics in Medicine is >>>>>>> just >>>>>>> about dead, put another nail in the coffin.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/27/20 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well... here we are one week later, and we just ticked over 1 >>>>>>> million confirmed infections in the US. Let's hope that's the tip of the >>>>>>> iceberg, and that the actual infections is in the neighborhood of 50-80 >>>>>>> million. I don't believe the number is actually that high, but I would >>>>>>> believe something around 5-8 million. Either way, it is still just >>>>>>> speculation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bp >>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/20/2020 9:33 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What are the treatments that are now working? I try to be >>>>>>> optimistic about antivirals and convalescent plasma, but right now they >>>>>>> mainly have ventilators, which honestly aren’t very successful if >>>>>>> 70-80% of >>>>>>> the people die. They keep doing that because it’s the textbook therapy >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> respiratory distress, but it ain’t working. Even if it were working, >>>>>>> ventilators are not a treatment, they don’t reverse the disease, they >>>>>>> are >>>>>>> just a measure to get you oxygen while your body hopefully fights the >>>>>>> infection. And then you have the people experiencing kidney failure and >>>>>>> needing dialysis, they’re not sure if the damage is permanent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I hope you’re right that the medical community has learned how to >>>>>>> treat it, but I haven’t heard the evidence for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding a vaccine, one interesting piece of information I read was >>>>>>> that even if they develop a successful and safe vaccine (many challenges >>>>>>> including the sensitization problem), then they have to scale up vaccine >>>>>>> production. Right now most vaccines are just for each new wave of >>>>>>> schoolchildren, this would have to be for the entire population. And >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> in chicken eggs, it would have to be in big vats. And the interesting >>>>>>> part >>>>>>> is they could repurpose fermentation tanks used for things like brewing >>>>>>> beer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2020 11:20 AM >>>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Time will tell based on whether it actually starts declining in a >>>>>>> meaningful way, or whether we're going to bump along for a bit. >>>>>>> Remember, >>>>>>> the goal was to flatten the curve; it wasn't necessarily going to reduce >>>>>>> the number of infections. I get the impression that the medical >>>>>>> community >>>>>>> has learned a lot about how to actually treat it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's see where we are a week from today (April 27). If we are over >>>>>>> 1 million infections, this may be going a while yet. If it is under 1 >>>>>>> million, I would be more encouraged. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> bp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/20/2020 8:20 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks a bit Gaussian to me. I hope... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <image001.png> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> ------------------------------ >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
