yep, and your message can be removed in an instant if it does not comply with the narrative
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:06 AM <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Not really. Today you can get your message out to the world with a tweet. > How would you have been able to do that 100 years ago? > > *From:* Steven Kenney > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2020 9:54 AM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism > > I sense overwhelming sarcasm. > > -- > Steven Kenney > Network Operations Manager > WaveDirect Telecommunications > http://www.wavedirect.net > (519)737-WAVE (9283) > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"chuck" <ch...@wbmfg.com> > *To: *"af" <af@af.afmug.com> > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 28, 2020 8:14:10 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism > > 100 years ago it was newspapers and they only printed what they wanted you > to hear. Things are much better now. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 28, 2020, at 2:49 AM, Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > > It's a problem when the main conduits for communication are all private > corporations though, especially in situations like this. > > On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > >> Most people don’t realize that the constitutional protection of free >> speech protects the government from stifling speech...private citizens and >> corporations are not required to protect anyone’s speech. >> >> Not saying I agree or disagree with it, just stating what the >> constitution says. >> >> YMMV >> >> -Sean >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:19 PM Jason McKemie < >> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >>> Being "not evil" I guess. Another copy has been put up, but the stifling >>> of free speech is a bit alarming. They do this all of the time with things >>> the left deems inappropriate. I'm pretty much centrist, but the fringe at >>> both sides is absolutely abhorrent, I'll go back to adhering to lent now. >>> >>> On Tuesday, April 28, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Whoa, google took it down? That's amazing. I wonder what the process >>>> that resulted in that was? >>>> >>>> On 4/27/20 8:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>> >>>> I'll watch it again, but it's a bit difficult now since Google took it >>>> down. Doesn't help the case that they feel like they need to cover it up as >>>> opposed to just tearing it apart if it is so wrong. >>>> >>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's was pitched that way but you look at what they are doing with the >>>>> "numbers" is totally fictitious... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4/27/20 7:01 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If we're thinking of the same video I thought it was pretty >>>>> refreshing, and the overall gist of the thing seemed pretty sound to me. >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, April 27, 2020, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yep, speculation that a couple of doctors in Kern County CA treated >>>>>> like science fact to back up their agenda... Ethics in Medicine is just >>>>>> about dead, put another nail in the coffin.. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/27/20 12:25 PM, Bill Prince wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Well... here we are one week later, and we just ticked over 1 million >>>>>> confirmed infections in the US. Let's hope that's the tip of the iceberg, >>>>>> and that the actual infections is in the neighborhood of 50-80 million. I >>>>>> don't believe the number is actually that high, but I would believe >>>>>> something around 5-8 million. Either way, it is still just speculation. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/20/2020 9:33 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What are the treatments that are now working? I try to be optimistic >>>>>> about antivirals and convalescent plasma, but right now they mainly have >>>>>> ventilators, which honestly aren’t very successful if 70-80% of the >>>>>> people >>>>>> die. They keep doing that because it’s the textbook therapy for >>>>>> respiratory distress, but it ain’t working. Even if it were working, >>>>>> ventilators are not a treatment, they don’t reverse the disease, they are >>>>>> just a measure to get you oxygen while your body hopefully fights the >>>>>> infection. And then you have the people experiencing kidney failure and >>>>>> needing dialysis, they’re not sure if the damage is permanent. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hope you’re right that the medical community has learned how to >>>>>> treat it, but I haven’t heard the evidence for that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding a vaccine, one interesting piece of information I read was >>>>>> that even if they develop a successful and safe vaccine (many challenges >>>>>> including the sensitization problem), then they have to scale up vaccine >>>>>> production. Right now most vaccines are just for each new wave of >>>>>> schoolchildren, this would have to be for the entire population. And not >>>>>> in chicken eggs, it would have to be in big vats. And the interesting >>>>>> part >>>>>> is they could repurpose fermentation tanks used for things like brewing >>>>>> beer. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, April 20, 2020 11:20 AM >>>>>> *To:* af@af.afmug.com >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT still a bit of hope and optimism >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Time will tell based on whether it actually starts declining in a >>>>>> meaningful way, or whether we're going to bump along for a bit. Remember, >>>>>> the goal was to flatten the curve; it wasn't necessarily going to reduce >>>>>> the number of infections. I get the impression that the medical community >>>>>> has learned a lot about how to actually treat it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let's see where we are a week from today (April 27). If we are over 1 >>>>>> million infections, this may be going a while yet. If it is under 1 >>>>>> million, I would be more encouraged. >>>>>> >>>>>> bp >>>>>> >>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/20/2020 8:20 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks a bit Gaussian to me. I hope... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <image001.png> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > ------------------------------ > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
