I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti
here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz.
Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid
operators, say so.
If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so.
If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis
studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so.
In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that
has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less
whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common
courtesy.
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
On 01/15/2015 08:49 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 1/15/15 9:36, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 1/15/15 9:12, Josh Reynolds wrote:
This email has more angst than my 15 year old at 8am on a Saturday.
On January 15, 2015 8:09:07 AM AKST, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
I can give you the contact of a licensee that's having the problem I
described on a smaller scale if you think you can hep them. They have
not been amused.
Actually it's a community college, and ULS isn't exactly secret. Give
WQRP301 a call. They are having repeated problems with people stepping
on their 18GHz paths without issuing a PCN. If you have advice to give
instead of being smug about my opinion on the problem that's be more
helpful.
~Seth
