On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote:
I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti
here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz.
Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid
operators, say so.
If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so.
If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis
studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so.
In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that
has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less
whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common
courtesy.
I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein,
with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not
only agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would
exacerbate existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage
of ignorant operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like
UBNT making it easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do
bad things (i.e. past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR).
~Seth
