Of course not by AF24, tiny beamwidth and low power.  It's brother
however?  ;-)



On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
> If only you could read some of Josh's emails to us and you would see that he
> isn't always showing us the love ;)  He will dish it when it is due...I have
> seen it publicly as well ;)
>
> Healthy discussion on backhauls and backhaul pricing...I will say that since
> the AF24 launch, I have not seen an email/post related to AF24 causing
> issues due to being installed by ignorant operators...
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>>
>> Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti
>>>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz.
>>>>
>>>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid
>>>> operators, say so.
>>>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so.
>>>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis
>>>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so.
>>>>
>>>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that
>>>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less
>>>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common
>>>> courtesy.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein,
>>> with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not only
>>> agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would exacerbate
>>> existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of ignorant
>>> operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making it
>>> easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things (i.e.
>>> past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR).
>>>
>>> ~Seth
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to