If only you could read some of Josh's emails to us and you would see that he isn't always showing us the love ;) He will dish it when it is due...I have seen it publicly as well ;)
Healthy discussion on backhauls and backhaul pricing...I will say that since the AF24 launch, I have not seen an email/post related to AF24 causing issues due to being installed by ignorant operators... On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> > wrote: > >> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti >>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. >>> >>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid >>> operators, say so. >>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. >>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis >>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. >>> >>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that >>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less >>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common >>> courtesy. >>> >>> >> >> >> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, >> with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not >> only agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would >> exacerbate existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of >> ignorant operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT >> making it easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad >> things (i.e. past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR). >> >> ~Seth >> > >
