My AF5 doesn't do 40 miles and gigabit? I demand Ubiquiti refund my money and pay for my tower climbers' time or allow me to increase the power to 1kw.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Caleb Knauer <cknauer.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course not by AF24, tiny beamwidth and low power. It's brother > however? ;-) > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote: > > If only you could read some of Josh's emails to us and you would see > that he > > isn't always showing us the love ;) He will dish it when it is due...I > have > > seen it publicly as well ;) > > > > Healthy discussion on backhauls and backhaul pricing...I will say that > since > > the AF24 launch, I have not seen an email/post related to AF24 causing > > issues due to being installed by ignorant operators... > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > >> > >> Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti > >>>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. > >>>> > >>>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid > >>>> operators, say so. > >>>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. > >>>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis > >>>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. > >>>> > >>>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something > that > >>>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less > >>>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common > >>>> courtesy. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, > >>> with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I > not only > >>> agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would > exacerbate > >>> existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of > ignorant > >>> operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making > it > >>> easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things > (i.e. > >>> past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR). > >>> > >>> ~Seth > >> > >> > > >