My AF5 doesn't do 40 miles and gigabit?  I demand Ubiquiti refund my money
and pay for my tower climbers' time or allow me to increase the power to
1kw.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Caleb Knauer <cknauer.li...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Of course not by AF24, tiny beamwidth and low power.  It's brother
> however?  ;-)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
> > If only you could read some of Josh's emails to us and you would see
> that he
> > isn't always showing us the love ;)  He will dish it when it is due...I
> have
> > seen it publicly as well ;)
> >
> > Healthy discussion on backhauls and backhaul pricing...I will say that
> since
> > the AF24 launch, I have not seen an email/post related to AF24 causing
> > issues due to being installed by ignorant operators...
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:37 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :)
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti
> >>>> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid
> >>>> operators, say so.
> >>>> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so.
> >>>> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis
> >>>> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so.
> >>>>
> >>>> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something
> that
> >>>> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less
> >>>> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common
> >>>> courtesy.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein,
> >>> with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I
> not only
> >>> agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would
> exacerbate
> >>> existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of
> ignorant
> >>> operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT making
> it
> >>> easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad things
> (i.e.
> >>> past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR).
> >>>
> >>> ~Seth
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to