Seth be careful stepping on the toes of ubiquiti's No#1 fanboi :) On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote:
> On 1/15/15 11:02, Josh Reynolds wrote: > >> I don't understand how an 18GHz path has anything to do with Ubiquiti >> here, since the closest product they make to that band is on 24GHz. >> >> Ifyour problem is with ignorant operators, or just plain stupid >> operators, say so. >> If your problem is with Ubiquiti, say so. >> If your problem is with people failing to do the proper path analysis >> studies and frequency coordination (byyour PCN comment), say so. >> >> In any of these cases, it sounds like you are angry about something that >> has nothing to do with Ubiquiti or even an operator, but more or less >> whoever was *supposed* to be in chargeof the link design and common >> courtesy. >> >> > > > I agreed with the post I responded to and the points contained therein, > with my real life experience extrapolated to it a short response. I not > only agree that licensed bands get used up faster, but that it would > exacerbate existing instances of interference due to a higher percentage of > ignorant operators jumping on a lower entry point or companies like UBNT > making it easier for ignorant operators to enter the space and do bad > things (i.e. past issues with compliance test mode and TDWR). > > ~Seth >
