The more I do wireless, the more I prefer the microcell model. Telrad's equipment certainly seems like something you would use in a macrocell-type setup, if for no other reason than price. I've seen much more consistent jitter when using Ubiquiti in a microcell vs macrocell application.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Patrick Leary < patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> wrote: > That just me drinking the Koolaid and believing it Jason. I do though > think the latency ding Moto users have always done is a red herring. I've > never in my entire career had an actual operator using my gear telling > latency caused them problems. The issue is really jitter, and we do better > than UBNT on that. Our first LTE beta Daniel Moore at Unggoy in Iowa) even > had his link scored between his Telrad and COMPACT and the Telrad won in > terms of gaming performance. > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jason McKemie < > j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > >> Ok, with all due respect, this is BS (and I'm not talking about Base >> Station either). With some of the new gear that Ubiquiti has and Mimosa is >> releasing, I could get more bandwidth and lower latency to the end user at >> a lower price - this is what WISPs have excelled at for many years. I'm >> sure your equipment has its place and the NLoS capabilities would certainly >> be helpful. A competent operator coming to any given area with your >> equipment does not equal a shut door. >> >> -Jason >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Patrick Leary < >> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Know this though, should a competent COMPACT operator come into your >>> market...your goose is cooked. Until then, hold any opinion that makes you >>> comfortable. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Patrick Leary > Director BD, North America, Telrad > 727.501.3735 > patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG] > patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate > address] >