Here are the jitter quotes I was looking fro from Daniel Moore: "There is a higher latency on the WiMAX platform. With LTE we see an average of 20 ms added vs 40-60 ms with WiMAX. That said- the latency & jitter is much more stable than our WIFI gear. Almost no jitter on both WiMAX and LTE. With UBNT we see 5-8 ms of jitter. 1-2 on WiMAX & LTE."
"We haven’t used the built in VoIP client on any CPE’s yet. We have tested VoIP services behind a Telrad CPE on both WiMAX & LTE- so far we haven’t seen a difference in quality over our 5 Ghz network. We have however noticed a huge improvement in online gaming- we have found that the scheduler is great at keeping a connection consistent in terms of ping and jitter which is important for both services. Pingtest.net actually rates our Telrad clients at a higher quality than our legacy clients connected using other gear. We will be testing the built in VoIP clients soon, I can report our feedback at a later point in that aspect." On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Jason McKemie < j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: > The more I do wireless, the more I prefer the microcell model. Telrad's > equipment certainly seems like something you would use in a macrocell-type > setup, if for no other reason than price. I've seen much more consistent > jitter when using Ubiquiti in a microcell vs macrocell application. > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Patrick Leary < > patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That just me drinking the Koolaid and believing it Jason. I do though >> think the latency ding Moto users have always done is a red herring. I've >> never in my entire career had an actual operator using my gear telling >> latency caused them problems. The issue is really jitter, and we do better >> than UBNT on that. Our first LTE beta Daniel Moore at Unggoy in Iowa) even >> had his link scored between his Telrad and COMPACT and the Telrad won in >> terms of gaming performance. >> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jason McKemie < >> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >>> Ok, with all due respect, this is BS (and I'm not talking about Base >>> Station either). With some of the new gear that Ubiquiti has and Mimosa is >>> releasing, I could get more bandwidth and lower latency to the end user at >>> a lower price - this is what WISPs have excelled at for many years. I'm >>> sure your equipment has its place and the NLoS capabilities would certainly >>> be helpful. A competent operator coming to any given area with your >>> equipment does not equal a shut door. >>> >>> -Jason >>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Patrick Leary < >>> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Know this though, should a competent COMPACT operator come into your >>>> market...your goose is cooked. Until then, hold any opinion that makes you >>>> comfortable. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Patrick Leary >> Director BD, North America, Telrad >> 727.501.3735 >> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG] >> patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my >> corporate address] >> > > -- Patrick Leary Director BD, North America, Telrad 727.501.3735 patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG] patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate address]
