I figured it out. I'm really not used to Mikrotik. It was because it wasn't 
getting the next hop. I had the gateway configured incorrectly. I guess I need 
to go back to networking 101!

It's always something so simple!

Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield

> On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Brett A Mansfield <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> At this point I haven't even connected the radios. All of my stuff is 
> production on a UBNT edgerouter PRO. This Mikrotik will replace that 
> edgerouter. I'm directly connecting to the Mikrotik with a laptop.
> 
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
> 
>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:47 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Oh, yeah. Maybe there's an upstream router missing a route back to this 
>> router that has the public subnet configured?
>> 
>>> On 6/9/2015 10:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>> Can the devices on publics ping the WAN public?  Next hop up?
>>> 
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> 
>>>> On Jun 9, 2015 11:39 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" 
>>>> <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>>> All UBNT. Almost every model XM and XW and a few dozen of their AC line. 
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:31 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> What radios?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 6/9/2015 9:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
>>>>>> The public is on bridge1. VLAN 100 is a layer on top of bridge1. So 
>>>>>> public is not tagged and VLAN 100 is, both on bridge1. I have each CPE 
>>>>>> getting an IP address on VLAN 100 and bridging the public to the 
>>>>>> customers router.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Is 192.168.100.1 and 108.165.x.x both on the vlan interface?  Or one 
>>>>>>> bridge1 and one vlan100?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Brett A Mansfield 
>>>>>>>> <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> The public IPs are not on a VLAN. The subnet is 108.165.x.0/24. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I currently have eth1-eth7 bridged. Bridge1 is where I have the public 
>>>>>>>> IPs. Bridge1 VLAN 100 is the private IPs of 192.168.100.0/24. I don't 
>>>>>>>> use the SFP+ ports yet. Eth8 is the internet port. It has an IP 
>>>>>>>> address of 108.165.x.246/30. I currently have this confit on an UBNT 
>>>>>>>> edgerouter and it works flawlessly other than the random panics of the 
>>>>>>>> OS. The local public subnet is routed.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Are the public IPs on the VLAN 100 interface?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Need some configuration here.  What are the device's IPs/subnets?  
>>>>>>>>> What is the Mikrotik's LAN/vlan100 IP/subnet?  What about WAN?  Is 
>>>>>>>>> the local "LAN" public subnet routed to the rest of the world?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield 
>>>>>>>>> <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I am fairly new to Mikrotik and I cannot get it to do what I want.  
>>>>>>>>>> I have the CCR1036-8G-2S+.  I have one VLAN using private IPs.  It’s 
>>>>>>>>>> VLAN 100.  I also have a /24 subnet of public IPs.  I have NAT setup 
>>>>>>>>>> for the VLAN because it does need internet access.  I have no NAT on 
>>>>>>>>>> the untagged VLAN of public IPs.  I can access the net using VLAN 
>>>>>>>>>> 100, but not the public IPs.  Anyone else run into this or have any 
>>>>>>>>>> ideas or thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I’ve tried both Static and Dynamic IPs.  I have NOT tried to 
>>>>>>>>>> removing the VLAN 100 yet.  I will give that a shot later today.  I 
>>>>>>>>>> do not have any kind of firewall on here just yet.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>>>>>> Silver Lake Internet, LLC
>> 

Reply via email to