There is a ton of good information on the MT forums. Offer still stands.
----- Original Message -----
From: Brett A Mansfield
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik routing
I did figure it out, thanks. Now I need to figure out the firewall.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 10, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Glen Waldrop <gwl...@cngwireless.net> wrote:
Get it figured out?
I might be able to give you a hand. Hit me up off list.
From: Brett A Mansfield
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 12:17 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik routing
I have. I even tried it not bridged. I can always get it working just fine
with NAT on a private subnet on a VLAN, it just doesn't want to route my public
IP addresses that are not on a VLAN.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 9, 2015, at 11:12 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
Wasn't there something posted the other day about these ccrs and cores to
ports? Have you tested this in all 7 bridged ports with the same result?
On Jun 9, 2015 11:42 PM, "Brett A Mansfield"
<li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
They can ping the WAN public, but not the next hop.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
Can the devices on publics ping the WAN public? Next hop up?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 9, 2015 11:39 PM, "Brett A Mansfield"
<li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
All UBNT. Almost every model XM and XW and a few dozen of their AC
line.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:31 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
What radios?
On 6/9/2015 9:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
The public is on bridge1. VLAN 100 is a layer on top of
bridge1. So public is not tagged and VLAN 100 is, both on bridge1. I have each
CPE getting an IP address on VLAN 100 and bridging the public to the customers
router.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Is 192.168.100.1 and 108.165.x.x both on the vlan interface?
Or one bridge1 and one vlan100?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Brett A Mansfield
<li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
The public IPs are not on a VLAN. The subnet is
108.165.x.0/24.
I currently have eth1-eth7 bridged. Bridge1 is where I have
the public IPs. Bridge1 VLAN 100 is the private IPs of 192.168.100.0/24. I
don't use the SFP+ ports yet. Eth8 is the internet port. It has an IP address
of 108.165.x.246/30. I currently have this confit on an UBNT edgerouter and it
works flawlessly other than the random panics of the OS. The local public
subnet is routed.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Are the public IPs on the VLAN 100 interface?
Need some configuration here. What are the device's
IPs/subnets? What is the Mikrotik's LAN/vlan100 IP/subnet? What about WAN?
Is the local "LAN" public subnet routed to the rest of the world?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield
<li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
I am fairly new to Mikrotik and I cannot get it to do
what I want. I have the CCR1036-8G-2S+. I have one VLAN using private IPs.
It’s VLAN 100. I also have a /24 subnet of public IPs. I have NAT setup for
the VLAN because it does need internet access. I have no NAT on the untagged
VLAN of public IPs. I can access the net using VLAN 100, but not the public
IPs. Anyone else run into this or have any ideas or thoughts?
I’ve tried both Static and Dynamic IPs. I have NOT
tried to removing the VLAN 100 yet. I will give that a shot later today. I do
not have any kind of firewall on here just yet.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
Silver Lake Internet, LLC
