I spoke too soon. Seems I cannot route the public IPs. It was working with the 
management VLAN through the masquerade, but the publics still don't work.

Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield

> On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:36 PM, Brett A Mansfield <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I figured it out. I'm really not used to Mikrotik. It was because it wasn't 
> getting the next hop. I had the gateway configured incorrectly. I guess I 
> need to go back to networking 101!
> 
> It's always something so simple!
> 
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
> 
>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 10:19 PM, Brett A Mansfield 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> At this point I haven't even connected the radios. All of my stuff is 
>> production on a UBNT edgerouter PRO. This Mikrotik will replace that 
>> edgerouter. I'm directly connecting to the Mikrotik with a laptop.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Brett A Mansfield
>> 
>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:47 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Oh, yeah. Maybe there's an upstream router missing a route back to this 
>>> router that has the public subnet configured?
>>> 
>>>> On 6/9/2015 10:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>> Can the devices on publics ping the WAN public?  Next hop up?
>>>> 
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015 11:39 PM, "Brett A Mansfield" 
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> All UBNT. Almost every model XM and XW and a few dozen of their AC line. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:31 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> What radios?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 6/9/2015 9:44 PM, Brett A Mansfield wrote:
>>>>>>> The public is on bridge1. VLAN 100 is a layer on top of bridge1. So 
>>>>>>> public is not tagged and VLAN 100 is, both on bridge1. I have each CPE 
>>>>>>> getting an IP address on VLAN 100 and bridging the public to the 
>>>>>>> customers router.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:39 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Is 192.168.100.1 and 108.165.x.x both on the vlan interface?  Or one 
>>>>>>>> bridge1 and one vlan100?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Brett A Mansfield 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The public IPs are not on a VLAN. The subnet is 108.165.x.0/24. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I currently have eth1-eth7 bridged. Bridge1 is where I have the 
>>>>>>>>> public IPs. Bridge1 VLAN 100 is the private IPs of 192.168.100.0/24. 
>>>>>>>>> I don't use the SFP+ ports yet. Eth8 is the internet port. It has an 
>>>>>>>>> IP address of 108.165.x.246/30. I currently have this confit on an 
>>>>>>>>> UBNT edgerouter and it works flawlessly other than the random panics 
>>>>>>>>> of the OS. The local public subnet is routed.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Josh Luthman 
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Are the public IPs on the VLAN 100 interface?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Need some configuration here.  What are the device's IPs/subnets?  
>>>>>>>>>> What is the Mikrotik's LAN/vlan100 IP/subnet?  What about WAN?  Is 
>>>>>>>>>> the local "LAN" public subnet routed to the rest of the world?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Brett A Mansfield 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I am fairly new to Mikrotik and I cannot get it to do what I want.  
>>>>>>>>>>> I have the CCR1036-8G-2S+.  I have one VLAN using private IPs.  
>>>>>>>>>>> It’s VLAN 100.  I also have a /24 subnet of public IPs.  I have NAT 
>>>>>>>>>>> setup for the VLAN because it does need internet access.  I have no 
>>>>>>>>>>> NAT on the untagged VLAN of public IPs.  I can access the net using 
>>>>>>>>>>> VLAN 100, but not the public IPs.  Anyone else run into this or 
>>>>>>>>>>> have any ideas or thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve tried both Static and Dynamic IPs.  I have NOT tried to 
>>>>>>>>>>> removing the VLAN 100 yet.  I will give that a shot later today.  I 
>>>>>>>>>>> do not have any kind of firewall on here just yet.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>> Brett A Mansfield
>>>>>>>>>>> Silver Lake Internet, LLC
>>> 

Reply via email to