We have not tried 10fd Ethernet but the cables are only 10' or less and are
shielded
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 16:50, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like you're getting interference from the ethernet cable?
>
> have you tried running the 900 FSK on 10BaseT? That would lower the frequency
> of the ethernet by an order of magnitude.
>
> Alternately, using shielded cable or putting the ethernet in a metal conduit
> would also attenuate the ethernet noise.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>> On 7/23/2015 2:15 PM, Craig House wrote:
>> We have another tower that we have installed 900 FSK equipment on that seems
>> to be causing problems with a 2 way repeater system. The noise floor on the
>> 2 way system is 20 db higher when the equipment is on. The down side to
>> this is the tower owner is the repeater owner and without his repeater his
>> business suffers and the need for the tower is gone. We have in the past
>> had this issue and ran coax all the way up the tower to have only the
>> antennas on top and it solved this issue but I dont want to do this for a
>> FSK 900 radio? So my question would be, what are the odds that the new 450
>> 900 mhz that is only moments away from being released would work without
>> running Coax up the tower? I think this is an issue with the processor in
>> the FSK board not the RF @ 900mhz that is causing the problem. What have
>> others done about this. We have another tower that seems to be on the
>> brink of this same issue as well and I dont want to completely pull off all
>> 900 FSK but maybe I should? Should I just go to UBNT 900 until the 450's
>> release?
>
>
