However there are UBNT aps on the tower at 100fd with no noise from them
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 16:52, Craig House <cr...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote:
>
> We have not tried 10fd Ethernet but the cables are only 10' or less and are
> shielded
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 16:50, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like you're getting interference from the ethernet cable?
>>
>> have you tried running the 900 FSK on 10BaseT? That would lower the
>> frequency of the ethernet by an order of magnitude.
>>
>> Alternately, using shielded cable or putting the ethernet in a metal conduit
>> would also attenuate the ethernet noise.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>> On 7/23/2015 2:15 PM, Craig House wrote:
>>> We have another tower that we have installed 900 FSK equipment on that
>>> seems to be causing problems with a 2 way repeater system. The noise floor
>>> on the 2 way system is 20 db higher when the equipment is on. The down
>>> side to this is the tower owner is the repeater owner and without his
>>> repeater his business suffers and the need for the tower is gone. We have
>>> in the past had this issue and ran coax all the way up the tower to have
>>> only the antennas on top and it solved this issue but I dont want to do
>>> this for a FSK 900 radio? So my question would be, what are the odds that
>>> the new 450 900 mhz that is only moments away from being released would
>>> work without running Coax up the tower? I think this is an issue with the
>>> processor in the FSK board not the RF @ 900mhz that is causing the problem.
>>> What have others done about this. We have another tower that seems to
>>> be on the brink of this same issue as well and I dont want to completely
>>> pull off all 900 FSK but maybe I should? Should I just go to UBNT 900
>>> until the 450's release?
>>
>>
