We cannot deploy any 2.4 in my area due to high noise floors in the
urban area.
On 06/07/2016 02:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Coming from 2.4 Ubnt do you think it would meet or exceed capacity?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 7, 2016 2:59 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
I have tried a few, one short link through trees is still in
service, but if the trees are near the customer it is
unimpressive. You can probably replace any 2.4 FSK customers, but
the NLOS ones are going to be 2X or 4X or MIMO-A, so not taking
advantage of the 450 capabilities and eating up airtime on an
expensive platform with probably a 10 MHz channel.
LOS however it rocks.
*From:* Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:49 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP
Has anyone tried 450 3.65 for near Los situations like this
discussion?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 7, 2016 2:46 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com
<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Take into account the 24-25dBm Tx power on a 2.4 FSK AP vs
22dBm on a 2.4 450 AP. And you'll probably get a better
pattern on a sector vs omni. A V-pol omni doesn't typically
have a horrible pattern though. Except for vertical beamwidth.
Then you play with electronic downtilt models, etc. So it's
probably moot as far as Rx power levels go between the two.
We get OK penetration on the 2.4 450 sector we have up. Not so
much the noise at the tower as it is at the SMs. We're going
to get rid of it eventually along with all of the other 2.4
shit. It's a dead band just like 900 to us now.
On 6/7/2016 1:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Omni to a sector, of course. You're probably getting more
than 2 db unless it was a bonkers big omni and super small
sector.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser
<lists.wavel...@gmail.com <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a
cluster though. Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a
two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam width (think 14db) . Was
able to hook up every single customer I has on the FSK to
the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz
actually has impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot
better than the 3.65 for NLOS. ( I have used all the 450
frequency bands except 900)
If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already
have FSK up on 2.4 and nothing abmormal with your noise
floor then do it. You'll love it. The 450 is actually
better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around
some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt
<matt.mailingli...@gmail.com
<mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com>> wrote:
So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450
2.4 and how did
that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on
near LOS
connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so
far though.
> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some
Ubiquiti we tried and
> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have
tested but so far
> have not deployed more then couple test links.
>
> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what
are the differences
> you have seen in performance? Interference
tolerance among others?
>
> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what
was the reasoning?
