Josh,
We have several customers in that situation. No issues. Using 10Mhz channel. Getting ready to deploy the KP dual sectors with 5Ghz and 3.65Ghz. I can’t speak for everyone, but the 3.65 rocks in our area. Tyson Burris, President Internet Communications Inc. 739 Commerce Dr. Franklin, IN 46131 317-738-0320 Daytime # 317-412-1540 Cell/Direct # Online: www.surfici.net What can ICI do for you? Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly prohibited. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 2:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Has anyone tried 450 3.65 for near Los situations like this discussion? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 7, 2016 2:46 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com> > wrote: Take into account the 24-25dBm Tx power on a 2.4 FSK AP vs 22dBm on a 2.4 450 AP. And you'll probably get a better pattern on a sector vs omni. A V-pol omni doesn't typically have a horrible pattern though. Except for vertical beamwidth. Then you play with electronic downtilt models, etc. So it's probably moot as far as Rx power levels go between the two. We get OK penetration on the 2.4 450 sector we have up. Not so much the noise at the tower as it is at the SMs. We're going to get rid of it eventually along with all of the other 2.4 shit. It's a dead band just like 900 to us now. On 6/7/2016 1:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Omni to a sector, of course. You're probably getting more than 2 db unless it was a bonkers big omni and super small sector. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com <mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.com> > wrote: I have moved from pmp100 to 450 on 2.4ghz. Didn't do a cluster though. Went from a 2.4FSK on a 12db Omni to a two 450 sectors from KP 120 beam width (think 14db) . Was able to hook up every single customer I has on the FSK to the 450 and some were near-LOS. The 450 in 2.4ghz actually has impressively decent nLOS. I think its a lot better than the 3.65 for NLOS. ( I have used all the 450 frequency bands except 900) If you thinking about going 450 in 2.4 and you already have FSK up on 2.4 and nothing abmormal with your noise floor then do it. You'll love it. The 450 is actually better because you can run 10-mhz channels to get around some of the noise in 2.4 vs the FSK which was stuck at 20mhz On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com <mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > wrote: So has anyone moved a PMP100 2.4 cluster too PMP450 2.4 and how did that go? With PMP100 in 2.4 we do pretty good on near LOS connections. Only deployed PMP450 in 3.6 and 5ghz so far though. > We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and > some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far > have not deployed more then couple test links. > > For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences > you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? > > For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7639 / Virus Database: 4598/12379 - Release Date: 06/07/16
