Our OLTs were around $4k/EA, optics were like $200 or so. ONTs were like $90.
Rough math, 32 ports in 4 OLTs, 512 CPEs, 32 GPON optics = $68,500 not counting the splitters On Mar 6, 2017 12:21 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > ONT Housing $ 30.00 > ONT $ 215.00 > Unicam $ 15.00 > Cyber Power $ 85.00 > Cyber Power Install $ 110.00 > House Sub Total * $ 455.00 * > > OLT $11K/8/32 $ 42.97 > OIM $845/32 $ 26.41 > Splitter $900/32 $ 31.00 > DLC Subtotal * $ 100.38 * > > Electronics/Sub Total Expense/house * $ 555.38 * > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Monday, March 06, 2017 11:11 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON > > If you are using Calix, then your port cost will be very high. We went > Alphion. Our OLT and port costs were very low. This help us have less > oversub on ports. The plan was to design for a 32x1 but deploy a 16x1, with > the intent to to make it a 16x2 and overlay NG-PON2 in the future. > > On Mar 6, 2017 12:04 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > We have always done 32:1. I think Cascade Networks may have tried the 64:1 > > *From:* Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Monday, March 06, 2017 11:01 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON > > Google did 32x1. Common at the time of their initial deployment was 64x1. > The company I just got off the ground did 16x1. > > On Mar 6, 2017 11:47 AM, "Sterling Jacobson" <sterl...@avative.net> wrote: > >> AE gets to be a headache with power costs and heat control in cabinets. >> >> >> >> Low oversub GPON is plenty good for now and probably well into the future. >> >> >> >> I believe that is what Google did, maybe 8:1 max split? >> >> >> >> The temptation with GPON is to stretch it to the limits, which might >> cause some re-splicing down the road if you want super high FDX. >> >> >> >> AE doesn’t have that problem even with equipment a decade old I can still >> supply the same SFP+ switch with 180Gbps each if I want to carry that much >> on the backhaul. Equipment is super cheap, and it’s essentially backwards >> compatible with GPON if your neighborhood runs are short like mine. But >> again, lots of power is required. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 5, 2017 8:08 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> >> Calix has NG PON2 which does 10 Gbps per wavelength and multiple >> wavelengths all overlaid on GPON so nothing in the OSP has to change. All >> the splitters etc still work. That will give everyone on the PON 312.5 >> Mbps symmetrical all at the same time. So oversubscribing 3:1 you could >> sell 1G symmetrical to everyone and probably not run out of headroom. >> >> >> >> *From:* Carlos Alcantar >> >> *Sent:* Sunday, March 05, 2017 3:35 AM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> >> to add to this post with the new PON technologies being released this >> year giving everyone 1G FDX is going to be a non issue. >> >> >> >> >> >> Carlos Alcantar >> >> Race Communications / Race Team Member >> >> 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 >> >> Phone: +1 415 376 3314 <(415)%20376-3314> / car...@race.com / >> http://www.race.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of George Skorup < >> george.sko...@cbcast.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:44:29 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Small-scale GPON >> >> >> >> I'm not really worried about POTS and RF. Everyone is using cell phones >> and watching Netflix. >> >> The AE deployment is a total waste of equipment and resources for the >> utilization we're seeing. I have to go there next week and turn up another >> switch. The 1Gbps feed is averaging less than 100Mbps every night. The >> network owner was convinced that everyone had to have 1G FDX. They just >> don't realize how much electronics and power is required for 1k ports. >> There's less than 100 customers so far, so please, for the love of god, >> lets fix this now! We'll see what happens. >> >> Anyway.. this project we're looking to do on our own is a neighborhood of >> rich bitches. We already have PMP450 there and it works fine. They "want >> more speed" and if they're willing to put up some cash for it, then we'll >> build it. >> >> On 3/4/2017 9:55 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >> Alphion does, yes. >> >> >> >> On Mar 4, 2017 9:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> What kind of costs are you talking? >> Does it talk to ONTs? ONTs with POTS ports? >> >> Sterling is AE, I know his costs are pretty low. >> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup Sent: Saturday, March 04, >> 2017 8:39 PM To: af@afmug.com ; memb...@wispa.org Subject: [AFMUG] >> Small-scale GPON >> >> We're looking to do another "fiberhood" with GPON instead of AE this time >> around. I remember Chuck Hogg mentioned Alphion. Has anyone deployed the >> AOLT-4200? Looks like a good solution. Or what else have you used for small >> deployments? >> >> >> >> >> > >