Full routes is far from overrated. 

You can't run uRPF without full routes. 
You can't have proper traffic flow data without full routes. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Bruce Robertson" <br...@pooh.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 11:41:39 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rb1100ahx2 bgp load 

Also, running full routes is somewhat overrated. You can get the same failover 
and 95% of the same balancing with some clever filters. I usually go ahead and 
have them feed me full routes, but then I filter them down to just a few, 
making sure each upstream gets its own routes. 


On 5/9/17 4:20 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: 



I hear there are some versions better than others in terms of BGP performance, 
but Mikrotik BGP really belongs on x86 boxes until v7 is out. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "can...@believewireless.net" <p...@believewireless.net> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 5:59:50 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rb1100ahx2 bgp load 



Take a look at /tool profile (on in Winbox) to see where the CPU load is going. 
It is 
probably going to routing for BGP but you can verify it here. 


Is anything else running on the router? OSPF, VPN, PPPoE, etc? 


Where BGP really matters is when you lose one of your peers and it goes through 
and updates the tables. On lower powered boxes, this will peg the CPU and can 
cause OSPF flaps, dropped packets and other issues. 


On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Steve Jones < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > 
wrote: 

<blockquote>


We turned up BGP on one of our routers today, 2 peers, full routes, this is 
just one upstream, we will be turning up bgp with another provider shortly 
elsewhere on the network, I assume those tables will make their way to this 
router. 
load averaged 4-12% prior to turning up BGP now its running 60-90, even 
occasionally pegged 


is this a matter of tuning BGP and ROS packages, or is this just too much for 
the router? this is only at 150mbps, as we increase capacity I feel we have 
already scaled out of this router if its not a misconfiguration of something on 
my end 




Inline image 1




</blockquote>


Reply via email to