There were 5 or 6 totally mis-interpretations of my words in there, Boris. Mis-interpretations of my words was almost the whole content of your argument. I'll limit myself to the most important mis-interpretation below.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 7:10 PM Boris Kazachenko <cogno...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > Starting from your "contradiction": that's simply a linguistic equivalent of > my variance. Is it? What I mean by contradiction is different orderings of an entire set of data, not points of contrast within a set of data. E.g. if you take a group of people and order them by height you will generally disorder them by age. But if you order them by age, you will generally disorder them by height. The orders are (depending on correlation of age and height) contradictory. It's impossible to order them both at the same time. Is that really what you mean by "variance"? I understood your use of "variance" to mean something like edge detection in CNNs. You write: "... CNN ... selects for variance" Are you now saying your "variance" is my re-ordering of sets, and not "edge" detection or points of contrast within sets? To clarify what you mean by "variance", can you give me a concrete example, one which is comparable to my example of ordering people by height or age, alternately? ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T682a307a763c1ced-Ma5a6d254cc2308c2f66ae27e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
