On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 6:17 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> So I guess you claim that we > Things are obviously undergoing a bifurcation. So, no I'm not making any claims about ya'll (your "we"). I'm making claims about humanity not transhumanity. Transhumanity is destined for space (vacuum/weightless/hard solar radiation adapted cyborgs, and baby biospheres ala O'Neill). I don't consider those who have given up on humanity, such as yourself, to be eligible for Biosphere I, just as I am not eligible for transhumanity. While it is true that Musk's "truth orientation" is meant to preserve "humanity", whatever that means to him, it is obviously the case that his emphasis on neuralink is oriented toward transhumanity. All of our conflicts are reducible to the fact that transhuman-identified and human-identified are not able to take responsibility for their telos and understand the true nature of the conflict. So, take your polemics about baby-makers and shove it until you are able to take responsibility for your own values. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tc2616dc0a8577813-M4345db1f700119a90aaf3f62 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
