On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:30 PM, 441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I submit a proposal with adoption index 3 and title {Ambassador fix} and text
> {
> Amend Rule 2352 by removing the last paragraph.
> Retitle Rule 2352 to {The Ambassador Part I}
> Create a Rule with title {The Ambassador Part II} and text
> {
> Any player CAN, with Agoran Consent, cause Agora to post a blog post
> (specifying its title, text, and list of categories) or comment
> (specifying its text) to BlogNomic.
> If no rule titled {The Ambassador Part I} exists, the Rulekeepor CAN and
> SHOULD repeal this rule by announcement in a timely fashion from the last
> time there was a rule with that title. If e fails to do so, any player
> CAN repeal this rule Without Objection or With Agoran Consent.
> }.
> }.
This doesn't work because Rule 105 prevents persons from making Rule
Changes. In general, what is this supposed to fix?
> I submit a proposal with adoption index 3 and title
> {Alternate Ambassador fix} and text
> {
> If Rule 2352 contains the text
> {
> Any player CAN, with Agoran Consent, cause Agora to post a blog post
> (specifying its title, text, and list of categories) or comment
> (specifying its text) to BlogNomic.
> } then change the power of Rule 2352 to 3.
> }.
This doesn't do anything - Agora is not actually allowed to post blog
posts or comments regardless of Power.
> I submit a proposal with adoption index 3 and title
> {Clarify/Explicate Agoran Consent} and text
> {
> Amend Rule 1728 by replacing the text
> {
> 3) With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
> minimum of 1.
> } with
> {
> 3) With N Agoran Consent, where N is an integer multiple of 0.1 with a
> minimum of 1. ("With Agoran Consent" is shorthand for this method with
> N=1.).
> }.
> }.
Proposal: The rule already says that N is 1 unless otherwise specified (AI=3)
Amend Rule 1728 by removing:
("Without Objection" is shorthand for this method with N = 1.)
and by removing:
("With Support" is shorthand for this method with N = 1.)
> I submit a proposal with adoption index 2 and title
> {Clarify/Explicate Elder Support} and text
> {
> Amend Rule 2357 by inserting between the first and second paragraphs
> the text
> {
> For any positive integer N:
> *If a rule says that a person CAN perform an action with N Elder
> Support, e CAN perform that action With N Elder Support
> With N Supporters.
> *Only Elders are eligible to Support an intention to perform an action
> With N Elder Support With N Supporters.
> *When a person performs an action With N Elder Support
> With N Supporters, e thereby performs that action with N Support.
> *If a rule says that a person CAN perform an action with N Elder Support
> it does not thereby allow em to perform that action by announcement or
> any other method, except as allowed by other rules including this rule.
This is unnecessary.
> I submit a proposal with adoption index 3 and title
> {fix for Wisdom Of The Elders} and text
> {
> Amend Rule 1950 by replacing the text
> {
> Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
> either "none" (default) or an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.
> } with the text
> {
> Adoption index is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions, whose value is
> either "none" (default) or an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9
> or the integer 4294967296.
> }.
Nice catch, although this is a silly patch.
