On 07/18/17 20:13, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > This loosely replicates the idea of a vexatious litigant, and could easily be > folded into nichdel’s penalty reforms. The short timeout on Vexity, and the > increasing consent requirement for increasing Vexity, is meant to prevent a > rogue Referee from locking someone out of CFJs entirely. > > Thoughts? > > -o >
Note that the current econ proposal requires either shinies or AP to make CFJs without support. Also note that the Criminal Cases proto defines reducing someone's weekly AP as an appropriate punishment for High Faux Pas. All that's needed to integrate your concept into that system is defining excessive CFJs to be a Faux Pas.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
