I should also add: If a player wants to use all eir hard-earned shinies on useless CFJs (which the judges will get paid for resolving), then e should feel free.
On 07/18/17 20:26, Nic Evans wrote: > > On 07/18/17 20:13, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> This loosely replicates the idea of a vexatious litigant, and could easily >> be folded into nichdel’s penalty reforms. The short timeout on Vexity, and >> the increasing consent requirement for increasing Vexity, is meant to >> prevent a rogue Referee from locking someone out of CFJs entirely. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -o >> > Note that the current econ proposal requires either shinies or AP to > make CFJs without support. Also note that the Criminal Cases proto > defines reducing someone's weekly AP as an appropriate punishment for > High Faux Pas. > > All that's needed to integrate your concept into that system is defining > excessive CFJs to be a Faux Pas. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
