Jacob Nordfalk kirjoitti 7. sep. 2012 kello 09:23: For sme-nob, we use slr=1 all the time.
<e> <p><l>ahte<s n="CC"/></l><r>at<s n="cnjcoo"/><s n="clb"/></r></p></e> <e slr="1"><p><l>ahte<s n="CC"/></l><r>og<b/>at<s n="cnjcoo"/><s n="clb"/></r></p></e> This means that both "at" and "og" would have been translated to ahte, if we had had the nob-sme translation option. For sme-nob we do not need any restriction RL to prevent ahte from being translated to "og", the slr=1 does the same trix: ahte is translated to "at" __as long as our CG rule for substituting "ahte" with "ahte:1" does not hit, slr=1 will have the same effect as (a modularized) r="RL". So I see no need for combining the two tag types. So, > <e> <p><l>inte<s n="adv"/></l> <r>ikke<s > n="adv"/></r></p></e> > <e srl="1"><p><l>icke<s n="adv"/></l> <r>ikke<s > n="adv"/></r></p></e> should give ikke for both into and icke, but icke for ikke for the cases where your rule gives you reasons to choose icke. Trond. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
