On Wed, November 7, 2007 21:11, Zhukov Pavel wrote:
>
> 1) I know about Arch-Way.
>
> 2)  Arch starts to accelerate developing process and growing up
> repositories, however Devs/TUs count aren't growing - this way it becomes
> more and more unstable.
>  Arch can be small but stable instead of big and unusable, since we have
> limited numbers of Devs.

Um. The group has skyrocketed in the last year, what are you talking about.

> 4) Pacman developers do strange things deaning DB-backends and continue to
> develop ugly and very slow plaintext DB.

The db isn't that slow at all. Patches are welcome otherwise.

> 5) As i write above, arch devs now are growing up arch repos, but
> dependency
> problem still not resolved - e.g. most of resent problems can't be exists
> in
> rpm distros since it updates will be deny by package manager.

What do you mean? What dependency problems? Quit with the generics.

> 6) Fedora is not enterprise and there is no rpm-hell since fedora used
> yum.
> yum+rpm even more simple to manage packages than pacman. And it's FASTER
> than pacman!

Fedora is spun off red-hat, and thus still inherits a lot. It's also an
entirely diffrent type of distro.

As for yum+rpm being simpler, that depends on your point of view. I find
pacman simpler, and pacman faster. Yum was plain nasty last time I used
it.

> 7) I don't understand pacman devs - Bash pacman equal works only 10%
> slower
> than C pacman!

What are you on about.

I might as well cut this thread off here. There are no plans for a stable
arch. It's nothing more than an idea, and nobody has started coding on
anything. I'm sorry if Romashka got you excited, but it's not on the
drawing boards in the remotely near future -- there's bigger things to
worry about.

If you want to start a stable Arch, go ahead. Talking will not write code
or build PKGBUILDS. Someone start it and *then* post to the list,
otherwise you'll be talking forever and nothing will result.

James


_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to