They are.
I should lend you mine sometime.
You'd love her.
Actually, I'm lending her out tomorrow to be a therapy dog
for a VA event.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dogs are cute.
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > I'll spare the group from a never ending argument with you about
> global warming,
> > because you've already made up your mind by proclaiming that it's
> natural, and not man
> > made.
> > I totally disagree with you. If anything, i'd say it's a
> combination of nature and the actions
> > of civilization...natural processes accelerated by pollution that
> began with the industrial
> > revolution.
> > I've studied it too, and not just since it became a political
> issue.
> > I honestly feel sorry for you, although you will never appreciate
> why.
> > You're the guy who thinks that dogs are merely cute, and that all
> animals are inferior
> > lifeforms to humans, and that god created us all. I wonder if you
> consoled Dan Jacobson
> > when he lost his dog by saying that "he was such a cute dog" ?
> > Not long ago, before he flip flopped on the global warming issue,
> GW Monkeeface Bush
> > stated that he was hesitant to take stronger action on global
> warming the way most of the
> > rest of the world was doing because it would "hurt the economy"
> > Of course, Bush isn't smart enough to realize when he says "the
> economy" that he actual
> > lacks the ability to think into the future. He's talking about the
> economy of his lifetime. So,
> > for him, it's better off to continue to kill the planet while he's
> still alive rather then do
> > something to help preserve life in the future. Then, GW flipflops
> and nodody notices,
> > probably because the media is controlled not by the news itself,
> but by the news makers.
> > So Tommy, go ahead and throw caution to the wind. Nothing is going
> to happen. We'll all
> > be fine.
> > Meanwhile, I'm going to continue to be outspoken about this issue,
> and prepare for the
> > possible effects in my lifetime.
> > So, let's say 30 or 40 years from now, and we are both still
> alive, and a Katrina like event
> > hits our area (which is traced to global shifts in climate and
> water temperatures)....
> > I'll be the guy with the boat helping people, and you'll be the
> guy standing on his roof
> > writing "HELP" with red spray paint. See you then. And no, I won't
> way "I told you so"
> >
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jack I admire liberals - when they're doing it right. The folks
> of
> > > the past - Thurgood, Martin, Bobby, they all focused on people -
> > > improving the lot of the less fortunate. If that's liberalism,
> then
> > > I'm down with the cause.
> > >
> > > Today's liberalism is all trees and animals. That would be great
> if
> > > we solved all the people problems. Until then, they're doing it
> > > wrong.
> > >
> > > As for Global Warming, it's really hard for me to concentrate on
> it,
> > > what with me being so busy burying all these folks who died from
> > > Bird Flu, not to mention I'm still recovering from that Y2K
> disaster.
> > >
> > > I've studied it. The science for human causation isn't there,
> > > particularly when compared to natrual whether patterns.
> > >
> > > Consider this too: So what if happens? It isn't the end of
> the
> > > world, it's a shift in access to world resources.
> > >
> > > Look at a globe. Do you think it's a coincidence that the
> world's
> > > most well off people live between latitudes 30 and 45?
> Temperate
> > > weather drives success - from food growth to manufacturing with
> > > available resources.
> > >
> > > So let's say the earth shifts and then traditionally
> disadvantaged
> > > people suddenly have the advantage of temperate whether and
> access
> > > to water and resources they didn't have before.
> > >
> > > Something wrong with that, or do you feel entitled to the
> benefits
> > > of the status quo? It would be a bad thing in your book if the
> > > disadvantaged suddenly become the advantaged? Sounds biblical.
> I
> > > recall something about the meek inheriting the earth.
> > >
> > > If the earth warms if isn't because if us; its natural. All
> America
> > > can do is plan on being in the best postion she can be to fight
> the
> > > wars that will natrually occur should access to resources change.
> > >
> > > Go USA.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Tommy,
> > > > When you make pathetic comments like "Go save a fricken polar
> > > bear" it
> > > > really shows off your ugly side, and it's not very flattering.
> > > > I blows my mind how a person who I imagine to be quite
> intelligent
> > > > somehow makes it a crime to be a liberal, and even worse to
> care
> > > about
> > > > the world we live in.
> > > > In your world view, you can only see your lifespan, and it's
> > > obvious
> > > > from your attitude. You could care less about the people to
> follow
> > > in
> > > > our footsteps.
> > > > If anything, I hope you have a long life, long enough to
> actually
> > > see
> > > > the suffering brought about by the excesses of today.
> > > > Of course, it's highly likely that you are just another global
> > > warming
> > > > armchair expert, who thinks Al Gore is BS and all the science
> is
> > > wrong.
> > > > Sad indeed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycheech"
> > > <asburycheech@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well Paul if Asbury Park is truly multi-cultural, then
> we
> > > are
> > > > > > > certainly going to have people who look at things
> > > differently
> > > > > > > (otherwise we aren't diverse, are we?). You and I look
> at
> > > > > Pivinski
> > > > > > > differently.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just to set the record straight, I vigorously
> supported
> > > Tom
> > > > > and
> > > > > > voted for him. I applaud his sense of civic
> responsibility,
> > > > >
> > > > > Relax Frank. Just because I stuck up for against Pivinski
> this
> > > one
> > > > > time doesn't mean people will think you and I are somehow
> > > together
> > > > > and aligned against him. You're reputation's safe.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't join cliques. I'm a solo act.
> > > > >
> > > > > I supported Tom Piviniski for Board of Education. I did so
> > > because
> > > > > he stopped me on the street and told me he was interested in
> > > doing
> > > > > somehting about the State Sponsored Segregation of the High
> > > School,
> > > > > and issue I've raised constantly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course since being eleted, he hasn't said boo about it
> > > (niether
> > > > > have you by the way).
> > > > >
> > > > > What is wrong with today's liberal activists? In the 40's,
> 50's
> > > and
> > > > > 60's these people focused on saving people - minority
> rights.
> > > > > Today? They focus on trees and whales.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pivinski typifies that. He concentrates on trees while
> > > governing a
> > > > > State Caused Racially Segregated School.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey Pivinski - Thurgood Marshall, Martin Luther King and
> Bobby
> > > > > Kennedy called - they said to tell you that you're no
> liberal
> > > > > activist.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now go save a friggin polar bear.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
