Oh look, here's another guy putting words in my mouth. Show me where I said 
anything
about
"a homicide bomber screaming Allah"
Oh wait, you must think that because you know I'm an Obama supporter and that I
actually
believe that Obama is somehow a terrorist in hiding.
Your right, I am a piece of work and proud of it, and I'm greatly looking
forward to the day
when Obama takes office and actually turns this country in a positive direction
for a
change.
I'd also like to add that the 8 years of damage that GW did to this county and
world are a
million times worse then anything Obama has ever been accused of.

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hemeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Evangelical Republicans scare the crap out of you yet a homicide bomber 
> screaming 
Allah before he kills innocent people is okay? YOu are a piece of work.
> 
> --- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jack Pitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> From: Jack Pitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Hijacked from true to equal protection
> To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, October 29, 2008, 3:55 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Actually, no, I'm not going to do that. I can't google quick enough, and 
> honestly, I don't 
> really care.
> If I wanted to, I could easily make the leap that one of the biggest support 
> groups for 
> Republicans are evangelical christians, who basically scare the crap out of 
> me.
> They are patently anti-gay.
> So, while it might be true that a republican figurehead such as a president 
> may not have 
> done anything to hurt the gay population, behind the scenes there is plenty 
> of hurt 
going 
> on by republican supporters.
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "justifiedright" <justifiedright@ ...> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Jack how do you post this without responding at all to the fact that
> > only a Democrat President has passed laws hurting gays?
> > 
> > You go straight to name calling.
> > 
> > Nothing to say about the fact that only a Democrat President had hurt
> > gays and Republicans haven't?
> > 
> > It's not a fair statement to say 'Democrats hurt gays" when only a
> > Democrat President as hurt them not once but twice?
> > 
> > Address the issue. I dare you.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Democrats hurt gays.
> > > Probably the most ignorant comment I've ever read here.
> > > I can't wait for this election to be over, because the hardcore
> > republicans appear to be 
> > > freaking out in desperation. Fox news was falling all over itself
> > this morning to find new 
> > > ways to put Obama down while grasping at straws.
> > > What's going to happen to all of the over-zealous republicans next
> > week when Obama 
> > > wins? Are you all going to go hide under your beds in fear?
> > > And what happens when Obama actually does good for our country? Are
> > you going to find 
> > > a way to trash him then?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "justifiedright"
> > <justifiedright@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You say below that Biden wants to "preserve the definition of marriage
> > > > in the constitution. "
> > > > 
> > > > Is that another Biden gaffe? Where does the constitution have a
> > > > definition of marriage?
> > > > 
> > > > Either he didn't say it and your source is wrong, or he's made yet
> > > > another of many silly gaffes.
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry to burst your bubble Jennifer but there have only been 1
> > > > executive order and 1 law signed by an American President.
> > > > 
> > > > Both were against gays. Both were signed by Democrat Bill Clinton.
> > > > 
> > > > No Republican President has signed a law or order against gays.
> > > > 
> > > > George Bush had a Republican House and Senate for 6 years and didn't
> > > > do it.
> > > > 
> > > > Democrat Bill Clinton did.
> > > > 
> > > > Open your eyes - Democrats hurt gays. 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jennifer" <jennifernjca@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "justifiedright" 
> > > > > <justifiedright@ > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > "> Your quote accused conservative of hate and fear mongering. The 
> > > > > > posts were disprove your point - it's the libs that are unhinged."
> > > > > 
> > > > > No Sir, you said Liberals alway change the subject in a response
> > to a 
> > > > > post I wrote about separating marriage from the state. I replied 
> > > > > that I wasn't changing a subject, but contributing my own
> > thought on 
> > > > > the topic which had already begun. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I simply replied to you with a question about Conservatives
> > trying to 
> > > > > scare people and stir up anger and hatred by fear mongering. No
> > one 
> > > > > is shouting to kill McCain or Palin at Obama rallies. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > You came back with some angry people threatening a woman who exists 
> > > > > to be the voice of soccer moms everyhwere. I gave you some very 
> > > > > clear examples and quotes from Republicans on the original topic - 
> > > > > civil rights for gay couples. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I did name the wrong law as the source of the debate DOMA. These 
> > > > > debates were over the the 2006 Federal Marriage Amendment not the 
> > > > > Defense of Marriage Act. It is the words stated that are scary.
> > The 
> > > > > amendment didn't pass. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Other quotes on the same topic:
> > > > > Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said he will
> > vote 
> > > > > against the measure on the floor but allowed it to get there in
> > part 
> > > > > to give the GOP the debate party leaders believe will pay off on 
> > > > > Election Day. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada "The reason for this 
> > > > > debate is to divide our society, to pit one against another. 
> > This is 
> > > > > another one of the presidents efforts to frighten, to distort, to 
> > > > > distract and to confuse America. It is this administration' s way of 
> > > > > avoiding the tough, real problems that American citizens are 
> > > > > confronted with each and every day."
> > > > > 
> > > > > "It's politics. It's pandering and it's placating a core 
> > > > > constituency, the evangelicals" San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom
> > > > > 
> > > > > You wrote "If you are for equalizing gay rights, you have no dog in 
> > > > > this Presidential hunt. Both candidates said at debate they agree 
> > > > > with one another - neither will equalize the marriage rights
> > (rather 
> > > > > lack thereof) for gays."
> > > > > 
> > > > > The current presidential election? I didn't bring that up at all. 
> > > > > Still, I knew some have spoken up so here's their own words on the 
> > > > > topic.
> > > > > 
> > > > > From the VP Debate
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: Would you support expanding that beyond Alaska to the rest of
> > the 
> > > > > nation? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > PALIN: Well, not if it goes closer and closer towards redefining
> > the 
> > > > > traditional definition of marriage between one man and one
> > woman. And 
> > > > > unfortunately that's sometimes where those steps lead. I don't 
> > > > > support defining marriage as anything but between one man and one 
> > > > > woman, and I think through nuances we can go round and round about 
> > > > > what that actually means. I'm being as straight up with
> > Americans as 
> > > > > I can in my non- support for anything but a traditional
> > definition of 
> > > > > marriage. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: Let's try to avoid nuance. Do you support gay marriage? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > BIDEN: No. We do not support that. That is a decision to be able to 
> > > > > be left to faiths. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > PALIN: My answer is the same as his and it is that I do not. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Marriages are an institution of faith and civil unions are an 
> > > > > institution of state. Sounds like Joe agrees. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > That famous executive experience of Palin's was often used to fight 
> > > > > gay civil unions. Sarah Palin fought Alaska's civil union laws. 
> > > > > Palin said she supported Alaska's decision to amend its
> > Constitution 
> > > > > to ban same-sex marriage. But she used her first veto as
> > governor to 
> > > > > block a bill that would have prohibited the state from granting 
> > > > > health benefits to same-sex partners of public employees. Ms. Palin 
> > > > > said she vetoed the bill because it was unconstitutional, but
> > raised 
> > > > > the possibility of amending the state Constitution so the ban could 
> > > > > pass muster. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Governor Sarah Palin today announced that, per the recent ruling of 
> > > > > the Supreme Court of Alaska, the State of Alaska's regulations
> > are in 
> > > > > effect to begin providing state benefits to same sex partners 
> > > > > beginning January 1, 2007. "The Supreme Court has ordered
> > adoption of 
> > > > > the regulations by the State of Alaska to begin providing benefits 
> > > > > January 1," said Governor Palin. "We have no more judicial options. 
> > > > > We may disagree with the rationale behind the ruling, but our 
> > > > > responsibility is to proceed forward with the law and follow the 
> > > > > Constitution. " 
> > > > > 
> > > > > In addition to adoption of the regulations, Governor Palin signed 
> > > > > HB4002 today, which calls for a statewide advisory vote,
> > proposed by 
> > > > > the Legislature during its November special session. "I disagree
> > with 
> > > > > the recent court decision because I feel as though Alaskans
> > spoke on 
> > > > > this issue with its overwhelming support for a Constitutional 
> > > > > Amendment in 1998 which defined marriage as between a man and
> > woman. 
> > > > > But the Supreme Court has spoken and the state will abide. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Alaska Governor's Office: Press release 06-012, "Same Sex" 
> > > > > Dec 20, 2006 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Palin said she's not out to judge anyone and has good friends
> > who are 
> > > > > gay, but that she supported the 1998 constitutional amendment. 
> > > > > Elected officials can't defy the court when it comes to how rights 
> > > > > are applied, she said, but she would support a ballot question that 
> > > > > would deny benefits to homosexual couples. "I believe that honoring 
> > > > > the family structure is that important," Palin said. She said she 
> > > > > doesn't know if people choose to be gay. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Anchorage Daily News, "Little play," by K. Hopkins Aug 6, 
> > > > > 2006 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: Do you support the Alaska Supreme Court's ruling that spousal 
> > > > > benefits for state employees should be given to same-sex couples? 
> > > > > A: No, I believe spousal benefits are reserved for married citizens 
> > > > > as defined in our constitution. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Eagle Forum 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate Questionnaire Jul 
> > > > > 31, 2006 
> > > > > Q: In relationship to families, what are your top three
> > priorities if 
> > > > > elected governor?
> > > > > A: 1. Creating an atmosphere where parents feel welcome to
> > choose the 
> > > > > venues of education for their children.
> > > > > 2. Preserving the definition of "marriage" as defined in our 
> > > > > constitution.
> > > > > 3. Cracking down on the things that harm family life: gangs, drug 
> > > > > use, and infringement of our liberties including attacks on our 2nd 
> > > > > Amendment rights. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Eagle Forum 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate Questionnaire Jul 
> > > > > 31, 2006 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Before you conclude that I am misinterpreting Biden's civil union 
> > > > > stand here's his opinion.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: In relationship to families, what are your top three
> > priorities if 
> > > > > elected governor?
> > > > > A: 1. Creating an atmosphere where parents feel welcome to
> > choose the 
> > > > > venues of education for their children.
> > > > > 2. Preserving the definition of "marriage" as defined in our 
> > > > > constitution.
> > > > > 3. Cracking down on the things that harm family life: gangs, drug 
> > > > > use, and infringement of our liberties including attacks on our 2nd 
> > > > > Amendment rights. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Eagle Forum 2006 Gubernatorial Candidate Questionnaire Jul 
> > > > > 31, 2006 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Barack Obama
> > > > > Q: You had one supporter on a Bible tour in South Carolina who said 
> > > > > that homosexuality was a curse and that he had been cured by
> > prayer. 
> > > > > Do you believe homosexuality' s a curse?
> > > > > A: No.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: Do you believe that it is something that you are born gay or
> > that 
> > > > > you can change your behavior? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > A: I do not believe being gay or lesbian is a choice. And so I 
> > > > > disagree with [that supporter]. But part of what I hope to offer as 
> > > > > president is the ability to reach to people that I don't agree
> > with, 
> > > > > and the evangelical community is one where the Democratic Party, I 
> > > > > think, we have generally seen as hostile. We haven't been reaching 
> > > > > out to them, and I think that if we're going to makes significant 
> > > > > progress on critical issues that we face, we've got to be able
> > to get 
> > > > > beyond our comfort zones and just talk to people we don't like.
> > I've 
> > > > > tried to do is to reach out to the evangelical community and tell 
> > > > > them very clearly where I disagree. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series Nov 11, 
> > > > > 2007 
> > > > > Q: You had one supporter on a Bible tour in South Carolina who said 
> > > > > that homosexuality was a curse and that he had been cured by
> > prayer. 
> > > > > Do you believe homosexuality' s a curse?
> > > > > A: No.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: Do you believe that it is something that you are born gay or
> > that 
> > > > > you can change your behavior? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > A: I do not believe being gay or lesbian is a choice. And so I 
> > > > > disagree with [that supporter]. But part of what I hope to offer as 
> > > > > president is the ability to reach to people that I don't agree
> > with, 
> > > > > and the evangelical community is one where the Democratic Party, I 
> > > > > think, we have generally seen as hostile. We haven't been reaching 
> > > > > out to them, and I think that if we're going to makes significant 
> > > > > progress on critical issues that we face, we've got to be able
> > to get 
> > > > > beyond our comfort zones and just talk to people we don't like.
> > I've 
> > > > > tried to do is to reach out to the evangelical community and tell 
> > > > > them very clearly where I disagree. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: Meet the Press: 2007 "Meet the Candidates" series Nov 11, 
> > > > > 2007 
> > > > > The notion of gay marriage has been used to divide people in black 
> > > > > churches. I pointed out that if there's any pastor here who can
> > point 
> > > > > out a marriage that has been broken up as a consequence of
> > seeing two 
> > > > > men or two women holding hands, then you should tell me, because I 
> > > > > haven't seen any evidence of it. And if you think that issue is
> > more 
> > > > > important to the black family than the fact that black men don't
> > have 
> > > > > any jobs and are struggling in the inner cities, then I profoundly 
> > > > > disagree with you. 
> > > > > Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The notion of gay marriage has been used to divide people in black 
> > > > > churches. I pointed out that if there's any pastor here who can
> > point 
> > > > > out a marriage that has been broken up as a consequence of
> > seeing two 
> > > > > men or two women holding hands, then you should tell me, because I 
> > > > > haven't seen any evidence of it. And if you think that issue is
> > more 
> > > > > important to the black family than the fact that black men don't
> > have 
> > > > > any jobs and are struggling in the inner cities, then I profoundly 
> > > > > disagree with you. 
> > > > > Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Q: You have said in previous debates that it is up to individual 
> > > > > religious denominations to decide whether or not to recognize same-
> > > > > sex marriage. What place does the church have in government-
> > > > > sanctioned civil marriages?
> > > > > A: It is my strong belief that the government has to treat all 
> > > > > citizens equally. I don't think that the church should be making 
> > > > > these determinations when it comes to legal rights conferred by the 
> > > > > state. I do think that individual denominations have the right to 
> > > > > make their own decisions as to whether they recognize same sex 
> > > > > couples. My denomination, United Church of Christ, does. Other 
> > > > > denominations may make a decision, and obviously, part of keeping a 
> > > > > separation of churches and state is also to make sure that churches 
> > > > > have the right to exercise their freedom of religion. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Source: 2007 HRC/LOGO debate on gay issues Aug 9, 2007 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obama may not support marriage for gays. He does support equal 
> > > > > rights under civil unions. McCain on the other hand supports 
> > > > > legislation that takes away the right constitutionally 
> > > > > 
> > > > > McCain announced his support last week for the California ballot 
> > > > > measure, known as Prop. 8. "I support the efforts of the people of 
> > > > > California to recognize marriage as a unique institution between a 
> > > > > man and a woman, just as we did in my home state of Arizona," he
> > said.
> > > > > Source: By Michael Finnegan and Cathleen Decker, Los Angeles Times 
> > > > > Jul 2, 2008 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Obama has said a lot more. He's appeared in debates on LOGO. I 
> > > > > don't want to be unfair to McCain here. He hasn't overtly opposed 
> > > > > rights to gays. I will leave their words to speak for them. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > However, I never asked about the current presidential election. I 
> > > > > only asked about Conservatives. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > If anyone is interested in how the candidates stand on different 
> > > > > areas of civil rights you can visit www.onthe issues.org 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't want rights that other people cannot have. It feels 
> > > > > unbalanced. I think of Laurel Hester who fought to her dying
> > breath 
> > > > > to have her hard earned pension awarded to her partner. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > There is sometimes no excuse for the inexcusable. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > BTW, I admire some aspects of the original almost altruistic 
> > > > > conservative movement. Those old small government guys weren't 
> > > > > trying to discriminate against any one group. The Republicans of 
> > > > > yore were the party of Lincoln. If I lived, 150 years ago I
> > would be 
> > > > > a Republican. I couldn't vote, but I'd be a Republican. The 
> > > > > original party founders must be looking down with horror at the 
> > > > > current one. I don't doubt that quite a few living ones are too. 
> > > > > I've just read an interview with one - Christopher Buckley, the son 
> > > > > of William F. Buckley, Jr. I hope you're more Buckley than Bush.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Jennifer
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to