At 10:20 AM -0700 6/12/05, Rajib Das wrote:
Hehehe...

Didn't you notice the public summarily dismissing your
case? :-)


*** I do notice that. Very well actually. But one has to consider where they comes from, their credibility, before placing value on such dismissals or approvals. As the saying goes: Look at the source:-).













--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 >In my judgement :-)

 *** And I rest my case :-).









 At 11:40 PM -0700 6/11/05, Rajib Das wrote:
 >In my judgement :-), there is no good programmer on
 >the horizon.
 >
 >Looks like you are judging. So am I. As citizens, I
 >assume we both have the qualifications to do.
 Unless
 >you believe there should be a dictatorship - by
 >definition it is then going to be a bad program.
 >
 >You are looking at the judge's qualification or the
 >programmer's? As a judge, I would look at basic
 >qualifications of the programmer such as whether he
 >knows the programming language at all or not.
 >
 >The programmer in this case does not seem to have
 >learned the programming language at all :-)
 >
 >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >
 >>  At 9:31 AM -0700 6/11/05, Rajib Das wrote:
 >>  >When a bad programmer sets out to create a NEW
 >>  >software program, ALL you get is garbage.
 >>  >
 >>  >What part of "garbage everywhere" is so hard to
 >>  >fathom?
 >>
 >>
 >>  *** How about a good programmer? Is he already
 under
 >>  commitment to
 >>  the powers that be and thus unavailable? Or is
 it
 >>  that the program in
 >>  place is already at the cutting edge, and thus
 no
 >>  meaningful
 >>  improvement is foreseeable?
 >>
 >>  Also WHO is deciding the QUALITY of the
 programmer,
 >>  and determining
 >>  it is bad, or will be bad? Does this judge have
 a
 >>  record to wave as a
 >>  reliable judge, either from past record or from
 >>  demonstrated
 >>  expertise?
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >>  >
 >>  >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 >>  >
 >>  >>  At 6:39 PM -0700 6/10/05, Rajib Das wrote:
 >>  >>  >Somehow I fail to understand, how without
 this
 >>  >>  >"cloning" (in a sovereign entity) this is
 going
 >>  to
 >>  >>  be
 >>  >>  >any different.
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  *** Clone of a defective system is more
 >>  defective
 >>  >>  progeny. What part
 >>  >>  of 'garbage in, garbage out' hard to fathom?
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >The "cloning" effect not only touches the
 GOA,
 >>  >>  >evidently it touches the militants and the
 >>  >>  >intellectuals as well.
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >Nothing selective about this cloning effect
 in
 >>  >>  Assam.
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 wrote:
 >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >If 'cloning' was the problem, how is
 that
 >>  we
 >>  >>  don't
 >>  >>  >>  read about stark
 >>  >>  >>  >examples from other states?
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  *** That is because you are selective
 about
 >>  what
 >>  >>  you
 >>  >>  >>  want to read or
 >>  >>  >>  hear, Ram. In fact this kind of thing is
 the
 >>  >>  rule
 >>  >>  >>  and not the
 >>  >>  >>  exception. But I will be sure to post
 >>  something
 >>  >>  >>  like this for your
 >>  >>  >>  info., when I come across one.
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>
 >>  >>  >>  At 4:35 PM -0500 6/10/05, Ram
 Sarangapani
 >>  wrote:
 >>  >>  >>  >C'da,
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >>  *** Incisive, steel trap minded
 >>  observation
 >>  >>  Ram.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >Thanks for the compliment, though
 throughly
 >>  >>  >>  undeserving.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >>Goes to prove, once again, that the
 >>  Assamese
 >>  >>  are
 >>  >>  >>  unfit to govern themselves.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 > >>  >>  >>  >That is your unique way of gross
 >>  >>  generalizations.
 >>  >>  >>  No, I was only
 >>  >>  >>  >referring to the GOA. The Assamese
 (people)
 >>  >>  were in
 >>  >>  >>  fact the victims.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >It is the GOA that is not able to
 govern. A
 >>  >>  >>  situation like this where
 >>  >>  >>  >someone is held in Tezpur for 58 years,
 >>  never
 >>  >>  >>  produced for trial - ie
 >>  >>  >>  >the individual was basically forgotten
 by
 >>  the
 >>  >>  GOA.
 >>  >>  >>  And its not just
 >>  >>  >>  >one case, there were 5.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >It is no use saying that the GOA has
 >>  learned
 >>  >>  this
 >>  >>  >>  from the Center,
 >>  >>  >>  >because I seriously doubt, if you will
 find
 >>  >>  such
 >>  >>  >>  cases in other
 >>  >>  >>  >states, where prisoners and inmates are
 >>  >>  forgotten
 >>  >>  >>  by the authorities
 >>  >>  >>  >to fall between the cracks and ignored
 for
 >>  >>  >>  eternity.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >  > >>  >>  >If 'cloning' was the problem, how is
 that
 >>  we
 >>  >>  don't
 >>  >>  >>  read about stark
 >>  >>  >>  >examples from other states? Wern't they
 >>  also
 >>  >>  cloned
 >>  >>  >>  in the GOI's
 >>  >>  >>  >image.
 >>  >>  >>  >
 >>  >>  >>  >--Ram
 >>  >>  >>  >

=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

Reply via email to