highdudgeon wrote: > Patrick, > > Let's see...you have a product to sell, right? So you're objective > about this?
Patrick is very objective. He doesn't sell or even particularly promote his products on these forums. > You have a product that is, well, eclipsed by the > transporter? Says who? The SB+ is a different animal to the Transporter. Besides, I suspect he may well come up with a Transporter+. > I think the burden is on you to prove, with numbers and > reasons, why your product is superior. No it isn't. You listen to them. If you don't hear a difference or like the result you don't buy them. Simple. > Ditto for Bolder and the Bybee > stuff. I shouldn't have to spend thousands of dollars on technology > that is blatantly, at least in part, silly, in order to prove my my > ears what a simple understanding of physics and engineering can > disprove. You don't have to spend a penny. You just have to listen and choose what you prefer. Physics and engineering can't explain everything. > But, again, as the seller can hardly be expected to be an obective > reviewer, I submit that the burden of explanation rests on you. No-one *owes* you an explanation. If you don't like any explanation you might receive then you don't buy. Simple as that. R. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
