bhaagensen;549155 Wrote: 
> I too used to think so, but after getting to know the Naim DAC I'm not
> so sure anymore. S/PDIF, as a transmission protocol, is less than
> optimal in the time-dimension in terms of precision required for
> precisely converting audio-data in a synchronous system. However, AFAIS
> the timing-issues are so small that in terms of data-transmisson, it is
> in practical applications easy to use S/PDIF as a semi-asynchronous
> protocol (like Naim does) - and thereby clocking the DAC 100%
> independently of the transport. 
> 
> It seems so simple, that I'm starting to think that the complexity of
> dedidated clock-lines is unnecessary (for the given application area).
Are you seriously suggesting that all the hoops Naim jump through is a
simpler solution than just sending a feed from the DAC's clock to the
transport? I respectfully suggest you have this completely the wrong
way round.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter -> ATC SCM100A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=78790

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to