magiccarpetride;581952 Wrote: > Really? I've yet to meet an audiophile who thinks that digital sounds > better than analog. Some deluded souls do claim that digital can sound > on par with analog, but no one ever claimed that it sounds better. > > At least to my limited knowledge, that is.
We won´t find an answer here also. Lately i sometimes have read that analog magic comes into play when reaching 24/192 even on some audiophile pages. Even the most best Jazz recording freaks in japan switched from analog tape to 384kHz. But that is a completely different story. Above you do again some marketig for the Caiman and how it tries to approximate vinyl. Well other audiophiles will tell you that attempt is false, better get a non-oversampling DAC :) I even wasted some time now visiting the Caiman page. Can´t find anything special on it. An generic up-to-date DAC with LM4562 Op amps in the exit that even i may like ;) It makes me wonder that you claim it sounds that much different as all other Dacs you heard. -- Wombat Transporter -> RG142 -> Avantgarde based monoblocks -> Sommer SPK240 -> self-made speakers ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=82520
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
