Phil Leigh;641921 Wrote: > Inguz is not the issue - it's only the convolver which is a pure maths > function. The art is in defining the convolution curve "nicely" and in > measuring the stuff accurately in the first place. > > Using Audiolense and a very good mic and ADC to capture (and using > Inguz only as the convolver) is a very different solution that IME is > ahead of (say) TACT et al. > > As someone who (in their time) has spent thousands on room treatments > in several rooms, I'm happy to say that I "know" DSP is more capable > than Helmholz resonators, bass traps, wave diffractors and other "bits > of foam" at taming the sound of speakers in a room. YMMV of course. In > either case, the real trick is to start with a room that needs as > little correction of any sort as possible (e.g. good dimensions and > materials and layout). Then the "correction" can mostly just deal with > the peculiarities of the speakers (in the room). Actually getting an even RT60 for a fair part of the frequency band is feasible with room treatments. This is very beneficial. Bass is trickier in smaller rooms like mine - the physical size of the treatments required get impractical. But I believe it's worth trying because reducing discontinuous resonances (biggest candidates usually being room modes) is very important to sound quality. Darren
-- darrenyeats http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. SB3, SB Touch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88582 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
