On Sep 16, 2008, at 7:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On 15-Sep-2008, at 23:14, NZIBIS wrote:
>> I'd like to see an option that allows the competion to only work on
>> text within the tags.
>
> I would be happy if I could disabled dictionary completion, full stop.

I really *like* the dictionary completion, so disabling it would have  
to be optional. I find the little icons to the left of the completion  
matches go a long way in helping me quickly choose an appropriate item.


>> But long HTML documents can get an awful lot of English (etc.)
>> words, which then "crowd out" the tags or attributes and their
>> values which, to my mind, overwelms it.
>
> On a very long document (I was in one that was 10K lines long) the
> completion can seriously bog down the process of editing as well.

Hmm, I'm not having any problems in this area. When you say "bog  
down", do you mean a performance issue or that there are simply too  
many choices in the list?

I just tried auto-completion in a log file of some 200K lines and  
performance seemed perfectly acceptable, although perhaps a bit less  
responsive than a smaller file. I also had no problem with the number  
of matches in the list, but maybe that has more to do with the type of  
content rather than the number of lines.


>> I'm also finding that it is offering "words" containing character
>> entities, e.g. "that’s", which I'm in two minds about.
>
> That is one thing that I do like, since otherwise fixing those things
> is a matter of an extra grep

Yes, I like the current behavior as it is too.


>> I can see that this will be a better fit when you don't also have a
>> lot of English (or whatever), as in the case of programming in,
>> Java, C or whatever, where the words already in the file or project
>> are mostly identifiers, etc., which is no doubt the original
>> thinking. (Here, I think you'd want to ignore words in comments and
>> perhaps the text arguments of "print" statements.)
>
> I find the completion very useful in php files, if there is not an
> over abundance of html/english also.
>
> Increasing the delay has really helped though

So far, I've used completion in PHP, JavaScript, HTML, and in writing  
prose, and I've been very happy with it in all cases. While I can see  
why some might like to be able to turn off dictionary or plain english  
inclusion, I'm pretty happy with the way it works now.

Although, I must admit that I did increase the automatic completion  
trigger to 1.0 seconds. The default 0.5 was a little too aggressive  
for my typing style.

-Dennis

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "BBEdit Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or 
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
rather than posting to the group.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to