In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JupiterHost.Net) writes:
>Nicolay A. Vasiliev wrote:
>
>> I didn't mean CGI, only standart types.
>
>Everyone is just using your own examples as examples of why your 
>arguments are moot :)
>
>That's the last .02 I'm spending on this crazy thread :)

The CGI.pm was a red herring.  The OP is complaining that
Perl does not do autoboxing.  He might be interested in
using this:

  http://search.cpan.org/~chocolate/autobox-0.11/lib/autobox.pm

I know, it's another module to use... but it does provide the
precious autoboxing.  Disclaimer: I haven't used it, I haven't
verified that claim.  Also, see:

  http://search.cpan.org/~swalters/autobox-Core-0.2/Core.pm

-- 
Peter Scott
http://www.perldebugged.com/
*** NEW *** http://www.perlmedic.com/

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>


Reply via email to