A J105 is rated at 10 tons, so that sounds about right with the C27.
It's like the entire volume, filled up with depleted uranium...I think that's
the form-u-lah!

tf



> When I was prepping my forms for documentation, I used 7.25' from midships
> deck to keel bottom, based on measurements made in AutoCAD from the
> profile
> view.  My gross tonnage calculated to about 8 tons, which qualifies--and I
> know other C27's are documented so it was probably right.  But I got to
> wondering later if I wasn't supposed to use depth of the canoe body, which
> only works out to about 4.6'--a lot less.  That's what's used for
> scantling
> numbers and other calculations that consider displacement.  But the CG
> simplified application method is kinda mysterious.  I don't know how in
> the
> world a C27 would be considered an 8-tonner, although I suppose if I keep
> buying batteries and gear I'll hit that soon (and ride 12 inches deeper
> than
> I should... )
>
> Dave Shaddock
> Pixie the Submarine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 6:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: catalina27-talk: gross tonnage measurments
>
> if you know the name of a Catalina 27 that is documented, you can
> search for it here and use that figure
>
> http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/CoastGuard/VesselByName.html
>
> or get the form and figure it out from here:
>
> http://www.uscg.mil/hq/msc/t3/cg5397/cg5397.htm
>
> best of luck!
>
> tf
>
>
>> hi not sure if this where i ask questions or not. but i am wondering if
>> anyone knows what the tonnage depth (top of the deck to the bottom of
>> the
>> keel) measurement is.  and what the gross tonnage of the cat 27 is?  i
>> am
>> also wondering what the gross tonnage and net tonnage coeffiecients are?
>> thanks for any help. peace.
>>
>> james
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Enter today for your chance to win $1000 a day-today until May 12th.
>> Learn
>> more at SignInAndWIN.ca
>> http://g.msn.ca/ca55/215
>
>



Reply via email to