> Grant wrote: > I'm not sure if you mean that the UK and Canada have long lines and crappy > care of if you mean the US would if they adopt this type of system. >
The latter. But I would also ask who has the better medical research & development infrastructure. In other words it's one thing to provide care, it's totally another to develop the care. And then there's the choice thing: if I'm provided with 2 choices, ignorant to the other 1000, sure I'm going to say I'm really happy with my choice. If I know about the other 1000 now how do I feel? So the real question is does the entire system drive innovation, cost reduction, and medical advancement as best as possible? Because it's one thing to not refuse care, but what kind of care are we providing? And who decides what kind of care? The consumer, industry, or the government? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:288762 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
