You've confused me with Bettlejuice, for some strange reason he thinks the recommendation of age forty for mm's forced ins co's to pay for them. I tried to explain it more cost effective to catch cancer early. What I was implying was that the so called public option plan would ban early detection mm's. Since the PO would likely put most ins co's out of biz that would eventually mean all plans.
To clarify, he thinks ins co's will stop paying because they're evil and they can. Then when people hit forty and discover they're in stage 2 or 3 cancer they will be deemed unfixable and will be sent off someplace to die quickly saving everyone money. He's close but it's actually the Obama plan not the insurance co's. On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The ruling on mammograms has had the opposite effect for some > carriers. Kaiser is running ads stating "all our women get > mammograms'". So as usual, you're wrong. > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Death panels are real and they are already fast at work. >> Mammograms are no longer recommended for women under 50. That means >> soon health care won't pay for them. That means death to women under >> 50 with breast cancer. >> It's started already. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309673 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
