Oh bullshit. I did not excuse the security issue --- just made the remark as a side comment. There are in fact issues that have not been fixed since 2001. The buck stops at Obama, as I said.
And hey, I am sure you have a list of reasons why this was not addressed in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, or 2008. And hey. I am sure *you* know exactly how to detect powder in someone's underwear! On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Scott Stroz <boyz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Funny, not once does the word 'wrong' appear in my post. > > Also note that I never claimed Bush does not shoulder any blame for > 9/11. I was merely using the metrics laid out in countless other > threads and applying them to this incident. > > The same problem that existed in 2001 exists now. Different agencies > had information about the attack/attempted attack and if that > information had been shared, odds are none of the scumbags would have > been able to get on a plane. For not changing those policies, I blame > Obama. > > Sorry, Dana, 'he's been busy' doesn't cut it. I can only imagine the > vitriol that would have spewed from this list if that was ever offered > up as an 'excuse' for Bush. > > You guys have proven once again that, in your eyes, what is good for > the goose, is not good for the gander. > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Jim Davis <hofli...@depressedpress.com> > wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 9:20 AM > >> To: cf-community > >> Subject: Who gets the blame for the attempted bombing on Christmas? > >> > >> > >> Based on Gruss' position about 9/11, it has to be Obama. Why? > > > > I'll agree. > > > > I also feel the need to point out that "wrong" is relative. Looking at > just > > these two incidents with the myopic focus you've demonstrated it's clear > > that Bush was vastly more wrong than Obama - if, as you are, comparing > them > > as otherwise equivalent events lain directly at the feet of the CIC. > > > > Obama: Missed one amateur, disturbed individual who's essentially random > > actions caused little actual damage. > > > > Bush: Missed a far-reaching, multi-target, heavily planned conspiracy > > involving dozens of people which resulted in massive human and economic > loss > > individually and nationally. > > > > Now let's play "who's more wrong in their response!" > > > > Bush, let's remember, unashamedly used the event to push a previously > > defined (but unrelated) agenda driving us into an abysmal well of debt. > > Then he gave the head of the CIA a medal. > > > > Obama, your move, sir. > > > > Jim Davis > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:309843 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
