Thank you for educating me. I said different. I didn't imply it was better. There is no "better" when we're talking about pedophiles Sam. You read between the lines when reading just the lines would serve you better.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Sam <sammyc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Medic <hofme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Wow, way to not respond to what I actually wrote. > > I did and corrected you ill advised facts > > > I mentioned highschool girls and you come at me about 9 year olds. > > I mentioned "little boys" and you come at me about 13 years olds. > > I mention a priest diddling a little boy being different than a male > teacher > > getting involved with a highschool girl and now you label me as being ok > > with adult males diddling 9 year old girls. > > > > Seriously Sam... do you have a learning disability? Tell me if you do and > > I'll be much more understanding about your reading comprehension. > > Here we go again. > > You implied men on teen girls was better than men on little boys. > I, believing they are both wrong, explained to you that the majority > of priest abuses are with teen boys and teacher abuse is pre-teen and > younger. rather than getting flustered confrontational, thank me for > educating you. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:315675 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
