"On the contrary, see above. But I used to get a lot of blank stares > when I talked > about this. As for the rest of what you say here, I have no information, > but it sounds pretty wild-eyed to me." > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis
Hehe. I have actually had a number of dealings with wikipedia articles lately, and one thing they have not done for me is make me any more likely to think something is *not* wild-eyed because it has a wikipedia article. I used to defend wikipedia, but these days I think it is only true that wikipedia often approximates truth when the topic is not controversial. This does not apply here. So I think my indifference to this matches yours to primary sources. Ah well. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:346174 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
