Again, thankfully the courts don't agree with you. Supremacy clause anyone? On Nov 17, 2012 12:41 AM, "Gruss Gott" <grussg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 16, 2012 2:41 PM, "LRS Scout" <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Ol' bill and Obama aren't ever at odds with the constitution and the law? > > > > Onne signed the assault weapons ban and started the first go of the NDRP; > > the other doubled down on the Bush policies, signed the NDAA, updated the > > NDRP, and just had a 16 year old US citizen murdered without due process. > > > > > I'm with you on everything except for the assault weapons - I agree that it > shouldn't have been signed, but I think for a different reason: > > I don't believe the Constitution contains a federal prohibition on local > government legislation of private gun ownership. My opinion is that states > (or cities for that matter) can legislate any gun control they want and I > think that's the best thing for America ... both because I believe in a > small federal government and I believe that's the top principle of the > Constitution: To set limits on how much the Federal government can invade > state's rights. > > Therefore my opinion is that the Constitution says that the Federal > government should neither be able to limit arms nor prevent > their limitation. > > A president shouldn't sign any such gun legislation simply because like > abortion, prostitution, and drugs, that's a state's rights issue. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:358477 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
