question then,

why should I get the same benefits you're living on right now Tim? I
never served in the US military, but by the logic used by the right to
work legislation I should get the same benefits as you get for your
service.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:13 PM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's called liberty.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Eric Roberts <
> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> But how do you have something like that without a requirement to join?  Why
>> should workers who do not join benefit from the workers that did join and
>> thus got the benefits of collective bargaining??
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>> Three Ravens Consulting
>> Eric Roberts
>> Owner/Developer
>> ow...@threeravensconsulting.com
>> tel: 630-486-5255
>> fax: 630-310-8531
>> http://www.threeravensconsulting.com
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:08 AM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Mandatory Union Tax Ending in Michigan?
>>
>>
>> But we're talking about the government forcing a third party into the
>> process of two parties negotiating compensation.  Like I said I don't have
>> any problem having unions, we need collective bargaining, hell several
>> years
>> ago I suggested starting an IT union on this very list to represent the
>> interests of "exempt salaried" employees who regularly get screwed over.
>>
>> I just don't want to see it forced on anyone.  when the government becomes
>> involved in that process to my mind it steps far outside the bounds of it's
>> responsibilities and powers.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Judah McAuley <ju...@wiredotter.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Well, hell, if you are just going to take an arbitrary Libertarian
>> > stand point, then you have perfect free and voluntary association even
>> > with union representation because no one is requiring you to apply for
>> > or take a union-represented job. If the notion of a union is too
>> > odious to you, then don't apply for a union job. You still have self
>> ownership.
>> >
>> > Personally, I think that taking it that far is kinda ridiculous. But
>> > it is exactly true in the same reductive Libertarian logic as the rest of
>> it.
>> >
>> > Judah
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:54 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > My statement is based on the fact that ALL LAW is based on the
>> > > monopoly
>> > on
>> > > the initiation and use of force in order to enforce said law.
>> > >
>> > > Every law on the books is only backed by someone with a gun and a
>> > > jail cell.  We need to be more careful about what we decide rises to
>> > > that
>> > level.
>> > >
>> > > What about free and voluntary association, and self ownership?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Judah McAuley
>> > > <ju...@wiredotter.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > No one said anything about force, dude. I was talking about the
>> > structure
>> > > > of labor law.
>> > > >
>> > > > I do have some mad respect for the old Wobblies though. They were
>> > > > some
>> > > hard
>> > > > mofos. I don't think we need that now, I do think that things have
>> > > evolved
>> > > > to the point where union structure and power needs to be looked at.
>> > > >
>> > > > That's not what these laws are intended for, however. If you start
>> > > > with
>> > > the
>> > > > premise that unions are bad, you aren't going to do a good job of
>> > > enacting
>> > > > reforms that make unions better. That simple. If you want to start
>> > > > from
>> > > the
>> > > > premise that unions are a good thing but need to be reigned in and
>> > > > make sure that they continue to be a force for good rather than
>> > > > evil, that's another matter.
>> > > >
>> > > > I feel the same way about corporations. Corporations are
>> > > > fundamentally
>> > a
>> > > > good thing. Left unchecked, however, the things that make them
>> > > > good can morph into structures that are capable of a great deal of
>> > > > harm. Unions
>> > > are
>> > > > much the same.
>> > > >
>> > > > Judah
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:40 AM, LRS Scout <lrssc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yes those things can suck man, but is force really the way to
>> > > > > fight
>> > it?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359116
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to