Adam,

What I am about to say is simply based on my experience and impression.
Point by point I would reflect it back to you this way:

1.  " The shock is the complete turn of stance by MM."

Jaye's Response:  Instead of saying complete turn of stance, I would say
altered course.  It's like being on a trip.  You may start out moving
towards one destination and yet in the process end up somewhere else.
As you take your trip you acquire experience and new information (and
technology) that simply leads you somewhere else.   That's a good thing.
We are making progress professionally.

2. Macromedia has marketed Cold Fusion as the fastest and easiest way to
create dynamic web based applications. That's been the core of CF with
the philosophy of getting applications out the door fast, at a very low
cost.

Jaye's Response:  That is still true.  Try a side by side comparison of
a CF APP and a JSP or ASP app.  You will laugh.

3.   What's happens now, is that MM is saying the _complete_ opposite.
They
are contradicting everything they have said, which quite frankly breeds
the mistrust I see popping up rapidly in the last few months.

Jaye's Response:  I have not actually heard MM say... he we want you to
build bloat-ware apps and kill your client base.  I am not sure if you
are aware, but lets just talk about passing data to your html page.
Every time you make a change that page must reload.  Queries, XML, HTML,
CFML, Javascript and all.  Using remoting you can load the interface
once and from there on out just pass data (e.g.  a dramatic bandwidth
savings) and your are not reloading the UI, etc...  That is a cool
thing.  Also people seem to have a difficult time trusting what they may
not fully understand (and that's no diss on you or anyone else).  

4.  as defined by MM will cost 3-4 times more than a
common cold fusion application.

Jaye's response:  As the sophistication and robustness grows, so does
the price to be honest with you. I am a capitalist, that does not bother
me.  Do you think it bothers the gas company if they charge you $2
instead of $1. RIA's in my mind bring us closer to the point that we can
put desktop applications out, due to the robustness of CMFL, CFC's and
Actionscript.


5. I think MM is still jumping the gun with broadband. I could never
implement something like this because I serve a worldwide audience. Only
a small percentage of people in the US have broadband, in countries like
Africa and Asia, the word broadband doesn't even exist.

Jaye's Response:  MM's people make decisions about their website like we
make decisions about the sites we develop.  Personally I don't find it
that heavy.

6.   Fact of the matter is that instead of slowly warming the developer
community to these ideas, MM has thrown boiling water on them.

Jaye's Response:  MM has been warming us up for about a year now.  You
can go back through DEVNET and read a huge amount of articles and
tutorials.  In addition MM provides Free online presentations (I
attended one last week) giving greater insight to the technology.  It's
there and available to you.  

7. Unfortunately this is just another bullet in the list of curveballs
MM
has thrown its developers.

Jaye's Response:  I am not sure if the expression "curve ball" can
really be used.  We have all seen it coming.  Maybe people anxiety is
increased a little saying, "where do I start".  CFUG's are a great place
to start.  I attended a great CFUG meeting with Charlie Arehart
(www.Systemmanagement.com) about a month ago.  He focused on "getting CF
developers over the hump" with building a RIA in about 15 minutes...
start to finish.  Once it was over, those fearing the FlashMX timeline
said "wow that was painless."

8. To be honest. I don't trust MM at all anymore, which is very daunting
being that I have only been listening to them since they bought Allaire.

Jaye's Response:  I cannot say I am in your shoes.  When Microsoft
released .NET for all intents and purposes there where a lot of
developers who have been doing that stuff for years and then they had to
re-tool and learn not only a new language and ways of thinking about
their applications, but new standards and practices as well.   To use a
metaphor, this is like a relationship.  The parties cannot possibly stay
as they where when they first met.  For the relationship to be a
success... if they are to continue on together, they have to compromise
and learn to accommodate each other.  Macromedia standing over our
shoulders (like our clients sometimes like to...lol) and say "YOU MUST
CODE THIS EXACT WAY and MAKE YOU INTERFACE EXACTLY LIKE THAT" to be a
solid coder.  That is up to you.  You are paid based on your coding and
design skills, not Macromedia's.  They are not god.  They just make some
pretty cool tools.

Sorry for any typo's.

Keep the Faith,

-//-  Jaye Morris - Multimedia Developer
-//-  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.navtrak.net
-//-  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.jayezero.com


<!--- Adam's original message starts here --->




-----Original Message-----
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The New Macromedia Website

Jaye,

You made some great points, but I'd like to elaborate on the culture
shock. This isn't culture shock for new technology, as web developers,
the only technology that can give us culture shock, is _old_ technology,
or the lack of change. The shock is the complete turn of stance by MM.

Macromedia has marketed Cold Fusion as the fastest and easiest way to
create dynamic web based applications. That's been the core of CF with
the philosophy of getting applications out the door fast, at a very low
cost.

What's happens now, is that MM is saying the _complete_ opposite. They
are contradicting everything they have said, which quite frankly breeds
the mistrust I see popping up rapidly in the last few months.

In my research an RIA as defined by MM will cost 3-4 times more than a
common cold fusion application. Additionally it will take 2-3 times
longer in development. I believe it was Kevin Towes who said at devCon
that a successful RIA needs a team of at least 12 people, a drastic
contrast to the lone CF developer ideology MM has endorsed in selling
points.

Now, I totally agree that RIAs are the next generation. However, I think
Macromedia is getting to bold for its own good. As a web developer, if I
launched MM.com, I would feel it was a failure. Not only does this RIA
take more time, money and people to produce.... but now it has to be
'tweaked' just to get it to perform at a reasonable speed. Furthermore,
I think MM is still jumping the gun with broadband. I could never
implement something like this because I serve a worldwide audience. Only
a small percentage of people in the US have broadband, in countries like
Africa and Asia, the word broadband doesn't even exist.

Fact of the matter is that instead of slowly warming the developer
community to these ideas, MM has thrown boiling water on them. This
backlash is a predictable outcome they should have seen coming.

Unfortunately this is just another bullet in the list of curveballs MM
has thrown its developers.

To be honest. I don't trust MM at all anymore, which is very daunting
being that I have only been listening to them since they bought Allaire.

Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division


-----Original Message-----
From: Jaye Morris - jayeZERO.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: The New Macromedia Website

Wow.  Talk about culture shock.   There has been quite a bit said today
about the new (beta) version of the layout.  I have checked out the site
and it was well done.  Personally I was impressed with some of the
backend action going on.  Pretty tight indeed.  Try out the "Your
account section".  I assume they are using remoting on steroids.    I am
intrigued as hell at the entire gig and the richness of the environment.
This is showing a great many possibilities, for all of us.
 
Related to "the site seems slow (etc.)", this is a beta.  Code gets
tweaked, enhanced etc.   All those people on the various soap boxes..
Have you not had to go back and tweak your own code, in order to make it
faster and more responsive?  Have you yourselves possibly had to work
out some unintended glitches and gotcha's?  Sometime I like to go back
and study my code (and UI) and see how I could do it better.  Tony Weeg,
who is our lead developer many times will say "hey what about this." and
in the end show me different (often better ways of doing something)  in
the end making me a better programmer.  MM staff members are developers
to.  Instead of having such a strong knee jerk reaction, perhaps we
should help them beta test this thing and offer "CONSTRUCTIVE
DIRECTION".   Even experts can learn new methods.  They seem to put
themselves out there, listen and where possible, integrate information
from our massively strong. 
 
In closing I will leave you with this:
 
1.  People have a tough time with change (if for not other reason than
they might have to fix their favorites).  BTW in psychology this is
called a "paradigm shift"  (e.g. learning to see things in a new way).
2.  Macromedia put their money where their mouth is.   Here's a realty
check for you.  How many times have you  been to  one of the elite
prophets of flash (including the book writers) and there is no flash on
their site?  (gawd.. Now that is a true contradiction.  Highly encourage
something and then not use it or demonstrate it yourself  (in terms of
practical application use).  What does that tell our client when we are
out there promoting RIA?
3.  CFMX and FlashMX (combined with remoting)   can carry this process
to the next level.  I encourage myself and you to be there  (and I am
sure you will).
 
Peace, Love and Soul Train!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Good coding, my friends.
 
 
-//-  Jaye Morris - Multimedia Developer
-//-  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.navtrak.net
-//-  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.jayezero.com
 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to