-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: > Indeed you should use CJKutf8 instead of CJK. The reason is the > following. > > Once upon a time, each script had its own encodings. This made it > easy to use different fonts: each encoding would use its own font. > > With UTF-8 this is slightly more problematic. And let's face it: the > Latin script of most Asian fonts just sucks (just look at Arphic). I > didn't expect anything else, anyway. > > If there is no "fontenc" option, all glyphs would use the CJK font. > To get nice Latin or Cyrillic glyphs, add [T1] or another font > encoding as an option, and CJK will first use fonts from the selected > font encoding. > > \usepackage{CJKutf8} without any options will always use the CJK > font. > > See doc/CJKutf8.txt for more information. > > > Best regards > > > > Danai SAE-HAN > 韓達耐 >
got it, thanks a lot again! Best wishes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE+tEbexs2apGZoVgRAkCDAKD43tX2uQlcgOqgMZZPSFEh0GWNRACeLxWv meovN3cqgQsqSo029ZrcxZc= =qOfW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cjk maillist - Cjk@ffii.org http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk