the responses to rich here sort of read like "lets make an ad-hoc test suite for clojure and everyone can run it" which is ridiculous.
tests should be contributed back to clojure. if contributing tests is so difficult people instead create their own test suites and report results then we need to stream line the contribution process. I cannot imagine this the kind of response rich was looking for, maybe he will clarify. On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, the Sonatype repositories have every Clojure development snapshot since > 1.3. > > -Stuart Sierra > clojure.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
