Don't want to feed the trolls but can you justify "ridiculous"? Rather a strong term.....or maybe your definition is "I don't understand the value".
Maybe you are right, maybe we should provide an easy way to submit test cases which are automatically run as part of a CI build....no wait, that was my ridiculous suggestion. Please ask yourself how your response added anything at all to this thread or community other than making it just a little harder for people to suggest things for fear of being ridiculed without any form of justification. A much better response would have been "I don't get it, please explain". Based on your ability to read Rich's thoughts maybe you have already had that conversation with me telepathically. Dunno. My (I.e. this) response hasn't added anything except to flag up a very unhelpful and negative comment (and been just a little therapeutic) Sent from my iPad On 31 Oct 2011, at 21:42, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote: > the responses to rich here sort of read like "lets make an ad-hoc test > suite for clojure and everyone can run it" which is ridiculous. > > tests should be contributed back to clojure. > > if contributing tests is so difficult people instead create their own > test suites and report results then we need to stream line the > contribution process. > > I cannot imagine this the kind of response rich was looking for, maybe > he will clarify. > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Stuart Sierra > <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes, the Sonatype repositories have every Clojure development snapshot since >> 1.3. >> >> -Stuart Sierra >> clojure.com >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > > -- > And what is good, Phaedrus, > And what is not good— > Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
