> Is this something that has been discussed and deemed > necessary? It has not been discussed. Nevertheless, it's a good idea, and I'm not going to prohibit a senior coder from implementing a new feature unless I have good reason to--doing so is a good way to get a stagnant source tree because no one wants to work on it. -- Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Change ... Kev
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kev
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Aaron Catella
- Re: [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu... Chris Crowther
- Re: [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu... Kev
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kev
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kev
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kevin L. Mitchell
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kevin L. Mitchell
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10... Michael Poole
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu... Kevin L. Mitchell
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ... Michael Poole
- [Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kevin L. Mitchell
- [Coder-com] Re: [Patches] [CVS] Module ircu2.10: Ch... Kevin L. Mitchell