> > Besides the quality of plugins which can change over time as more > people help out with a project and create better plug-ins, what do you > see as current/futurre advantages or disadvantages of Tog's plugin > based approach?
Both projects have plug in capability. All rails projects do by default BTW. It's one of the things that makes rails great. Philosophically speaking the tog people have chosen to make everything a plug in. Even the "core" module is a plug in. I guess they thought that it would best serve their audience. When you think about it CE itself is a plug in to your rails application. You can put CE into an existing rails app and voila you have an instant community. For whatever reasons Tog has more plugins than CE but there is nothing stopping you, me or anybody else from writing plugins for CE. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CommunityEngine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/communityengine?hl=en.
